Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
im not going to argue with a Covidian here. as its not the place. but i will just say this: i dont subscribe to what you subscribe to nor will i ever choose to live in fear.
By that "logic", wearing your seat belt or locking your door or taking any precaution is 'living in fear'. Which, of course, it's not - that's just your nonsensical spin.
Nadal was ranked #1 and was Defending Champion at 2009 Wimbledon and Did Not Play.
Nadal had won 2008 Wimbledon and also won 2010 Wimbledon.
Also Nadal was Defending Champion at 2014 US Open and Did Not Play.
And Nadal was Defending Champion at 2020 US Open and Did Not Play, and he also Did Not Play 2021 US Open.
But the winners of that 2009 Wimbledon (Federer) and 2014, 2020, 2021 US Opens were still legit winners.
And Nadal actually deserved to be at those events (but was injured, or skipped 2021 US Open for covid safety reasons) while Djokovic doesn't even deserve to be in Australia, and will also not be welcome at 2022 Roland Garros- https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sp...ry-2022-01-17/
There is a huge difference between choosing not to play and being told you cannot play. There will NOT be a legit male winner this year since Djokovic was not allowed to be in the tournament.
By that "logic", wearing your seat belt or locking your door or taking any precaution is 'living in fear'
No, locking your door is not likely to cause you to prematurely have a stroke or heart attack like getting the "vaccine" is.
If this was just a fringe theory and Djokovic was an adherent of a strange cult, then maybe, but there is tons of evidence out there that these "vaccines" are harmful especially to younger men.
So the shot does not prevent you from getting COVID, it doesn't prevent you from spreading COVID, and it is the most harmful "vaccine" ever created, yet governments all around the world are desperate for everyone to get it. Suspicious yet?
There is a huge difference between choosing not to play and being told you cannot play. There will NOT be a legit male winner this year since Djokovic was not allowed to be in the tournament.
Can you legally prove it? I don't think so.
Will the winners during covid years (2020, 2021 and 2022) have an asterisk next to their names? I don't think so.
There is a huge difference between choosing not to play and being told you cannot play. There will NOT be a legit male winner this year since Djokovic was not allowed to be in the tournament.
Its not that Djokovic wasn't allowed to enter the tournament, its that Djokovic wasn't allowed to stay in the country.
Think about that, he's so unworthy of winning the AO, that he wasn't even allowed to stay in the country of Australia.
Whereas Nadal is considered extremely unlucky to have missed 8 slams, and was very worthy of winning some of those.
Djokovic is simply not worthy, because it makes no sense for him to be the only unvaccinated player in the AO, when so many players only got the vaccine so they could play the AO.
And as disappointing as it is for Djokovic's fan base, they'll never be able to prove that Djokovic would have won the 2022 AO or 2022 French Open etc., and I can't imagine Wimbledon welcoming him back either....
interesting you bring up the last two years. Djokovic won last year. strange Australia allowed Novak in last year but wont let him in this year. they have lost their minds down under.
The reason why Australia allowed Djokovic in last year, is because the vaccine hadn't become a factor yet, so nobody was expected to be vaccinated.
Whereas now 92.6% of Australians (over age 16) are double-vaccinated, so there is no excuse for a tennis player to be unvaccinated, because the rules are for everybody involved.
All the spectators are vaccinated and therefore all the players are too.
And Djokovic chose not to be in the tournament when he refused to make the sacrifice that nearly all other players made.
ive never seen him as anything other than a decent guy. just because he doesnt subscribe to the Covidians' hysteria, i guess thats going to rub the Covidians wrong.
This has nothing to do with Covid. Have you not seen the way he acts on the court??
I think it's very possible Novak will fake vaccination in order to play in future tournaments that require it. I strongly suspect he is lying about testing positive for covid in December.
Looking forward to watching Tsitsipas, Alcaraz, Berrettini, Schwartzman, Sakkari, and Sabalenka!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
