Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > St. Louis
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-14-2009, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Southeast Missouri
5,812 posts, read 18,822,034 times
Reputation: 3385

Advertisements

While the whole plan has not been leaked to the public, some info is out there.

KMOX - Paul McKee -- What's his plan for north St. Louis? (http://www.kmox.com/Paul-McKee----What-s-his-plan-for-north-St--Louis-/4389692 - broken link)

Quote:
**Eminent domain an option to get land for business parks.
Scary. Even if this project works, I have a hard time overlooking McKee's destruction of historic homes across North STL the last few years, and it sounds like more destruction to come. Why couldn't he have incorporated these homes he destroyed into his residential plans?

http://www.urbanreviewstl.com/?p=6065
http://www.mayorslay.com/desk/display.asp?deskID=1247
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/89502D7C47BA07A7862575B5000E80BF?OpenDocument (broken link)
http://www.eco-absence.org/blairmont/map.htm (broken link)
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/FB0A745D9410E552862575B4001198D8?OpenDocument (broken link)
http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/building-blocks/residential-real-estate/2009/05/mckee-talking-about-blairmont-but-not-with-the-public-just-yet/ (broken link)

Last edited by STLCardsBlues1989; 05-14-2009 at 10:23 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-15-2009, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Fairview Heights, Hellinois
105 posts, read 309,413 times
Reputation: 43
I hope his plan fails. He has destroyed houses that could of been saved, just sohe can get the area declared blighted. He has bought homes, kicked out the tennants, left windows open and unboarded to let the elements in. Provided havens for drugs, prostitution, and violent crime, and supported brick rustling. Check out some of his land holdings:
Built St. Louis: The North Side | Blairmont Associates LC

and scroll down half the page on this next link:
Built St. Louis - Web Log
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 10:39 AM
 
389 posts, read 902,280 times
Reputation: 135
that clemens mansion was beautiful. Man that is unforgivable. His plan better be damn good. I'm not sure his plan is the best plan for revitalizing North St. Louis. I hope it succeeds though and the residents there are better off for it. Geez, the Clemens Mansion though
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 11:57 AM
 
Location: Fairview Heights, Hellinois
105 posts, read 309,413 times
Reputation: 43
Why do I have the feeling that the JeffVanderLou and St. Louis Place neighborhoods are gonna look like Winghaven/NewTown in 15 years when McKee is done with his plan?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Fairview Heights, Hellinois
105 posts, read 309,413 times
Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by arch_genesis View Post
that clemens mansion was beautiful. Man that is unforgivable. His plan better be damn good. I'm not sure his plan is the best plan for revitalizing North St. Louis. I hope it succeeds though and the residents there are better off for it. Geez, the Clemens Mansion though
I have a feeling that most of the current residents will not be living there when this is done. They will be priced out of the area and replaced by (mostly) white, upper middle class folks from the 'burbs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 03:48 PM
 
389 posts, read 902,280 times
Reputation: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by loki03xlh View Post
I have a feeling that most of the current residents will not be living there when this is done. They will be priced out of the area and replaced by (mostly) white, upper middle class folks from the 'burbs.
I'm not going to pretend I know how the makeup of the northside will look in the next 15 years but I hope it has a good mix of incomes and races.

Right now, white upper middle class folks from the suburbs hate the city. When you say white upper middle class I think a 50 year old white guy. He's a baby boomer and there is some generational way of thinking with them where they hate the city.

I expect the northside to get richer in its per capita income but I think it'll be young families moving into the city or young families being started in the city. Even before that happens schools have to be up to snuff.

Mckee's plan is suppose to create 22,000 jobs hopefully it creates a lot of work and opportunity for people already in the northside so it can begin to stabalize. McKee is involved in the potential china hub so warehousing or something of the sort is possible. That really doesn't require a college degree, so hopefully the more poor off people on the northside get the preference instead of being shipped off to cater to others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 03:51 PM
 
389 posts, read 902,280 times
Reputation: 135
^ I just wanted to follow up on this and ask which area in St. Louis has the widest/diverse range of incomes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Southeast Missouri
5,812 posts, read 18,822,034 times
Reputation: 3385
This is for Downtown:
RESIDENTIAL DEMOGRAPHICS
- Age: 18-24, 12.4%; 25-34, 46.3%; 35-49, 20.7%; 50-64, 18.4%; 65+, 2.2%;
- Income: $25,000 or less, 5.3%; $25,001-$35,000, 5.3%; $35,001-$50,000, 15.5%; $50,001-$75,000, 18.7%; $75,001-$100,000, 18.2%; $100,001-$200,000, 28.7%; $200,000+, 8.5%;
- Education: Some high school, 0.2%; High School graduate, 3.0%; Some college, 17.0%; College Graduate, 41.6%; Some post Graduate work, 12.8%; Post Graduate degree, 25.5%

I know McKee is doing a lot to get the China Hub deal here, but I'll have a hard time forgiving him for destroying North St. Louis in what he claims is an attempt to "save it" (my words not his).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-15-2009, 07:41 PM
 
389 posts, read 902,280 times
Reputation: 135
^ true absolutely, he has a lot of things to do to win me back for destroying so much, but I do hope he succeeds otherwise its all for not.

Is downtown the most diverse? What's the population downtown?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-20-2009, 10:38 PM
 
Location: Southeast Missouri
5,812 posts, read 18,822,034 times
Reputation: 3385
05/21/2009 - McKee lays out vision for massive north St. Louis redevelopment - STLtoday.com (http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/story/9630DCEBFAFF4847862575BD000FAB38?OpenDocument - broken link)

McKee lays out vision for massive north St. Louis redevelopment
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Missouri > St. Louis
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top