Wesley chapel Grove movies shooting (Spring Hill: hire, ending, illegal)

[EngGirl]

Originally Posted by Spring Hillian

That doesnt change much, but it does indicate the character of Mr. O.

I didnt see it posted, but the lady Reeves allegedly harassed earlier is NOT going to be called as a witness.
I guess her desire for 15 minutes of fame did not pan out. Other witnesses that prosecution was going to use are also off the witness list.

Yes, it changes a lot!

And taking witnesses one by one just shows how the defense it getting rid of valuable people... At the end of the day jury will have no idea this old a***l harassed someone else prior to that...

[EngGirl]

Originally Posted by Spring Hillian

Those who argued that texting was the reason for the shooting simply wanted to disregard everything else.

The texting was well over and done with when Mr. R shot Mr. O.

Mr. O was shot for launching a verbal and physical attack upon Mr. R.

What's the question?

Weird, but I've got a different vibe from all these...

Old MF killed someone just because he felt so, because OMG, he is an old macho, she has a permit and old police badge in his pocket, so he can use his go whenever he wants.... What a looser.

[jambo101]

Originally Posted by Spring Hillian

Mr. O was shot for launching a verbal and physical attack upon Mr. R.

What's the question?

I go to a lot of movies and before the movie starts it seems almost every one is engaged with their phones most often quietly texting away a practice i cant see as a bother to any one,so why did it bother Mr Reeves?.
The question i would have is what was Mr Reeves reason and demeanor in asking Mr Oulson to terminate his phone activity well before the houselights had dimmed,was it a polite request or was it more along the lines of Turn the f...ing phone off ahole you are bothering me..

[HWTechGuy]

What this revelation does for me is cause me to question the rest of the narrative...

[Ralph_Kirk]

Originally Posted by HWTechGuy

What this revelation does for me is cause me to question the rest of the narrative...

"The narrative" does not come from one person, but from several witnesses. Regardless who he was texting, IMO the most significant facto in terms of a self-defense consideration is that Reeves completely left the confrontation and then returned to it.

[jambo101]

We can go on and on with our opinions on the story, when does the actual trial start?

[Spring Hillian]

Originally Posted by EngGirl

Yes, it changes a lot!

And taking witnesses one by one just shows how the defense it getting rid of valuable people... At the end of the day jury will have no idea this old a***l harassed someone else prior to that...

The prosecution decided not to call those witnesses. Defense does not dictate who prosecution calls as witnesses.


It is apparent that Mr. Reeves never harassed anybody in the past.


Put down the misguided emotions and follow the known facts.

[EngGirl]

Originally Posted by jambo101

We can go on and on with our opinions on the story, when does the actual trial start?

at the beginning of 2015, but I bet his lawyers will try to take any evidence or witness report out... no evidence = no case => no conviction

any person with the brain will see there were no danger to old a***l's life, he was just too unstable mentally... there were NO reasons to use the gun whatsoever. Let's home you will get jury with the brain this time... speaking of jury. I hope everyone knows how much they are getting paid and most people with IQ higher that animal are most likely employed and will find excuses not to waste time and paycheck on long trails, so we will be faced with retired folks or some low chain people and they will be on old a***l side and pro-gun....

[Spring Hillian]

Originally Posted by EngGirl

at the beginning of 2015, but I bet his lawyers will try to take any evidence or witness report out... no evidence = no case => no conviction

any person with the brain will see there were no danger to old a***l's life, he was just too unstable mentally... there were NO reasons to use the gun whatsoever. Let's home you will get jury with the brain this time... speaking of jury. I hope everyone knows how much they are getting paid and most people with IQ higher that animal are most likely employed and will find excuses not to waste time and paycheck on long trails, so we will be faced with retired folks or some low chain people and they will be on old a***l side and pro-gun....

It is apparent that you do not know how the U.S. Court system works and have no respect for it.

What evidence do you have that Mr. Reeves was "unstable mentally" ??

[DUNNDFRNT]

Originally Posted by Spring Hillian

It is apparent that you do not know how the U.S. Court system works and have no respect for it.

What evidence do you have that Mr. Reeves was "unstable mentally" ??

He shot/killed a guy for flinging popcorn at him, oh yeah then told his wife to shut the f up. If I go by your narrative then he shot a guy because he thought he might get punched, and we all you know you get punched you die so clearly the guy flinched and he shot him, that sounds stable to me. To the original update, so the guy lied about why he was using his phone that doesn't change anything, is not like he testified in court, he told the old guy who was giving him crap about using the phone, that seems like pretty normal behavior my phone rings when I am in the middle of a conversation often, sometimes I say "I got to take this" you know what often I dont have to take the call at all.