Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-01-2011, 06:42 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
12,950 posts, read 13,339,664 times
Reputation: 14010

Advertisements

Why not?

The Dinky Dozen has been a dead end conference for a couple years now.

At least A&M's move might be the catalyst to start the 16 superconference shuffle up again.

I hope so, as the present alignments suck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2011, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,173,187 times
Reputation: 9270
TCU is an interesting idea for the SEC, but they would instantly be the smallest school in the conference (smaller than Vanderbilt). The SEC might gain some of the DFW market. TCU has two good sports programs - football and baseball. They have a lot of work to do to be reasonably competitive in the others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2011, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
686 posts, read 1,167,713 times
Reputation: 675
Although TCU has a stronger football team, I think Baylor should join A&M instead. Keeps the Brazos river rivalry with A&M intact in addition to giving balancing the SEC west Geographically. I also think Baylor has the overall stronger athletic program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2011, 09:43 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,840,928 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by HouTXmetro View Post
Although TCU has a stronger football team, I think Baylor should join A&M instead. Keeps the Brazos river rivalry with A&M intact in addition to giving balancing the SEC west Geographically. I also think Baylor has the overall stronger athletic program.
Your kidding right? I sure hope so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 12:33 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,540,106 times
Reputation: 12152
Hes right. Baylor has the better athletic program. TCU has the better football program.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 12:57 AM
 
1,196 posts, read 1,804,999 times
Reputation: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spade View Post
Hes right. Baylor has the better athletic program. TCU has the better football program.

When it comes to conference moves, it's about what schools bring, both on-and-off-the-field. It is also only about two sports: Football and men's basketball. The rest of the athletic program is not important.

Why those two sports: They are what attracts their alumni and fans to not just their games, but in donations to the school, they are what brings in eyeballs to their TV markets/deals and merchandising, they are what will help "brand" their universities (a great, well-publicized season will see an uptick in applications for the following incoming class), they are what drives the revenue and donations to support the rest of the department. Also what fan bases travels well to bowls and tournaments.

You also have to remember that conferences also look to bring in schools that are similar to their own. The Big Ten is known for their academics. Outside of Nebraska, who got removed this summer, every Big 10 school is part of the Association of American Universities. With the expectation of Northwestern University, all the schools are highly-ranked, research-heavy big state universities. PAC-12 is also somewhat similar in this way. It's one of the reasons why Texas is so highly coveted, but the rest of the remaining Big 12 schools aren't.

Religion relationships also limit a school's appeal to a major conference's makeup. It's one reason why BYU, even it's high-profile "brand", a large, loyal base of alumni and fans, and strong academics, will unlikely ever get invited to the PAC-12 or Big Ten. Hence why Utah got the invite over BYU. No way TCU or Baylor goes to the SEC (or outside of the Big East for TCU, any other major conference). Religious, smaller, schools who don't fit in. Baylor, if the Big 12 falls apart, will go to the Mountain West or CUSA in my view.

The SEC is not known for it's academics like the Big 10, ACC, or PAC-12. Schools like Oklahoma and Texas A&M would fit well into the SEC and the SEC culture.

Finally, it also is about expanding a conference's geographical footprint from getting into to media markets and recruiting pipelines.

To expand on the TV deals, conferences will not add schools if they do not add a positive revenue stream. By this, conference members split their TV deals and bowl proceeds by the number of schools. A school isn't going to add schools that not only maintain the amount of money that they split with their addition, they're going to want to see an increase in the hard dollar amount that is split per school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 09:53 AM
 
894 posts, read 1,546,967 times
Reputation: 1190
From the announcer for the Rice band last night at the Texas vs. Rice game: "The Aggies leaving the Big 12 and joining the SEC will raise the collective IQ of both conferences". What a hoot that got from the 101,000+ in attendance!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Denver
4,716 posts, read 8,575,994 times
Reputation: 5957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rustybolt View Post
From the announcer for the Rice band last night at the Texas vs. Rice game: "The Aggies leaving the Big 12 and joining the SEC will raise the collective IQ of both conferences". What a hoot that got from the 101,000+ in attendance!
I also liked when the band members spelled out $EC. Mind you, this was the Rice band saying all this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 02:51 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,840,928 times
Reputation: 3101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolfpacker View Post
When it comes to conference moves, it's about what schools bring, both on-and-off-the-field. It is also only about two sports: Football and men's basketball. The rest of the athletic program is not important.

Why those two sports: They are what attracts their alumni and fans to not just their games, but in donations to the school, they are what brings in eyeballs to their TV markets/deals and merchandising, they are what will help "brand" their universities (a great, well-publicized season will see an uptick in applications for the following incoming class), they are what drives the revenue and donations to support the rest of the department. Also what fan bases travels well to bowls and tournaments.

You also have to remember that conferences also look to bring in schools that are similar to their own. The Big Ten is known for their academics. Outside of Nebraska, who got removed this summer, every Big 10 school is part of the Association of American Universities. With the expectation of Northwestern University, all the schools are highly-ranked, research-heavy big state universities. PAC-12 is also somewhat similar in this way. It's one of the reasons why Texas is so highly coveted, but the rest of the remaining Big 12 schools aren't.

Religion relationships also limit a school's appeal to a major conference's makeup. It's one reason why BYU, even it's high-profile "brand", a large, loyal base of alumni and fans, and strong academics, will unlikely ever get invited to the PAC-12 or Big Ten. Hence why Utah got the invite over BYU. No way TCU or Baylor goes to the SEC (or outside of the Big East for TCU, any other major conference). Religious, smaller, schools who don't fit in. Baylor, if the Big 12 falls apart, will go to the Mountain West or CUSA in my view.

The SEC is not known for it's academics like the Big 10, ACC, or PAC-12. Schools like Oklahoma and Texas A&M would fit well into the SEC and the SEC culture.

Finally, it also is about expanding a conference's geographical footprint from getting into to media markets and recruiting pipelines.

To expand on the TV deals, conferences will not add schools if they do not add a positive revenue stream. By this, conference members split their TV deals and bowl proceeds by the number of schools. A school isn't going to add schools that not only maintain the amount of money that they split with their addition, they're going to want to see an increase in the hard dollar amount that is split per school.
Norte Dame is a catholic school and Miami is a small poor private school. That pretty much ruins your argument. Standford and Vanderbilt are both small private school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2011, 11:20 PM
 
1,081 posts, read 916,003 times
Reputation: 551
It's Labor Day and ut still sux.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top