Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-04-2012, 08:05 PM
 
4,775 posts, read 8,835,591 times
Reputation: 3101

Advertisements

Passenger rail advocates are pushing to bring back Amtrak service from Fort Worth to Kansas City, Mo., after a 33-year hiatus.
Even if things go well, it will likely be several years before the old Lone Star route, which was discontinued in 1979, can be resurrected -- and that's only if supporters cobble together startup funds of $136.5 million to $475 million from the federal government and the states served along the way.
But if it could be done, the Lone Star route today would serve up to 368,000 passengers per year, according to a service development plan completed in November. That would be more passengers than the line carried in its heyday, a supporter said.
Several alternatives could reduce the cost, including a proposal for a shorter route that would extend service from Fort Worth to Newton, Kan. -- about 190 miles southwest of Kansas City -- for about $136.5 million. From there, Amtrak riders could transfer to the Southwest Chief to complete their trip to Kansas City -- and the investment of public dollars would be less than the cost of rebuilding a freeway interchange in a major city, said Deborah Fischer-Stout, president of the Northern Flyer Alliance, a group that includes 49 cities along the Interstate 35 corridor that want to expand rail service.
Read more here: Rail advocates want to get Fort Worth-to-Kansas City service back on track | Local News ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2012, 06:41 AM
 
Location: World
4,204 posts, read 4,686,325 times
Reputation: 2841
I wish that goes thru. also fort worth is connected all the way to austin and san antonio so that it brings some respite from choking I-35. but knowing the nature of public opinion and politicians, they are just against rail.



Quote:
Originally Posted by kdogg817 View Post
Passenger rail advocates are pushing to bring back Amtrak service from Fort Worth to Kansas City, Mo., after a 33-year hiatus.
Even if things go well, it will likely be several years before the old Lone Star route, which was discontinued in 1979, can be resurrected -- and that's only if supporters cobble together startup funds of $136.5 million to $475 million from the federal government and the states served along the way.
But if it could be done, the Lone Star route today would serve up to 368,000 passengers per year, according to a service development plan completed in November. That would be more passengers than the line carried in its heyday, a supporter said.
Several alternatives could reduce the cost, including a proposal for a shorter route that would extend service from Fort Worth to Newton, Kan. -- about 190 miles southwest of Kansas City -- for about $136.5 million. From there, Amtrak riders could transfer to the Southwest Chief to complete their trip to Kansas City -- and the investment of public dollars would be less than the cost of rebuilding a freeway interchange in a major city, said Deborah Fischer-Stout, president of the Northern Flyer Alliance, a group that includes 49 cities along the Interstate 35 corridor that want to expand rail service.
Read more here: Rail advocates want to get Fort Worth-to-Kansas City service back on track | Local News ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Texas
14,076 posts, read 20,521,713 times
Reputation: 7807
How many people actually travel between Ft. Worth and Kansas City every day?

Obviously, not enough to justify regular train service or it wouldn't need to be subsidized.

This project has nothing to do with public convenience and much to do with political influence, ie: bringing home the bacon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-09-2012, 08:27 AM
 
Location: World
4,204 posts, read 4,686,325 times
Reputation: 2841
Many people travel between Austin-San Antonio or say Dallas-Houston. But conservatives who hate train will never allow it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by stillkit View Post
How many people actually travel between Ft. Worth and Kansas City every day?

Obviously, not enough to justify regular train service or it wouldn't need to be subsidized.

This project has nothing to do with public convenience and much to do with political influence, ie: bringing home the bacon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top