Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-28-2013, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Houston, Tx
1,507 posts, read 3,410,310 times
Reputation: 1527

Advertisements

the largest source of population growth in Texas is Births. Yes, the newest arrivals come from their mommies tummy's more often than from any other place in the world. Our birth rate accounts for more than 60% of the population growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-28-2013, 03:35 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,947,260 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd433 View Post
the largest source of population growth in Texas is Births. Yes, the newest arrivals come from their mommies tummy's more often than from any other place in the world. Our birth rate accounts for more than 60% of the population growth.
Wow this is news.



















(not srs)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2013, 03:43 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,941,105 times
Reputation: 12122
Excellent post justme02. Though it does seem a lot of economic and political rot is headed to Texas. Looks like the last hope for the country will be a place like one of the Dakotas and not Texas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2013, 03:52 PM
 
Location: Tysons Corner, VA by way of TEXAS
725 posts, read 1,240,221 times
Reputation: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Beagle View Post
Excellent post justme02. Though it does seem a lot of economic and political rot is headed to Texas. Looks like the last hope for the country will be a place like one of the Dakotas and not Texas.
The Dakotas?!?! Why? I'm sorry, I don't exactly understand this post. Would you mind elaborating?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-28-2013, 06:03 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,941,105 times
Reputation: 12122
Quote:
Originally Posted by majicdonjuan View Post
The Dakotas?!?! Why? I'm sorry, I don't exactly understand this post. Would you mind elaborating?
The Dakotas seem like they might be the only place liberals wouldn't try to invade after they finish ruining a state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 06:44 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,947,260 times
Reputation: 3545
It's too bad republicans can't live with others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Anytown, USA
681 posts, read 1,670,976 times
Reputation: 383
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Beagle View Post
The Dakotas seem like they might be the only place liberals wouldn't try to invade after they finish ruining a state.
How about Utah? Wyoming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 09:22 AM
 
Location: USA
4,433 posts, read 5,343,051 times
Reputation: 4127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trae713 View Post
It's too bad republicans can't live with others.

This statement is stupidity at its best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 10:14 AM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,947,260 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by rynetwo View Post
This statement is stupidity at its best.
No, this post is stupidity at its best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-29-2013, 12:52 PM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,941,105 times
Reputation: 12122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Chad View Post
How about Utah? Wyoming?
They are in parts of Utah. Liberals like places with mountains and/or trees, so states such as Idaho, Wyoming, and Montana will eventually become infected once states like California are completely reduced to rotting carcasses. They generally don't seem to like flat, cold, barren places much. Also, the economies of the Dakotas being based on agriculture and/or fossil fuels will probably play a part in keeping them away too, since liberals tend to think of anyone who works the land or produces fossil fuel products as ignorant rednecks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top