Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2013, 09:10 AM
 
Location: USA
4,433 posts, read 5,346,276 times
Reputation: 4127

Advertisements

What do you think folks?


Quote:

In a speech to the National Urban League in Philadelphia, Holder said that as its first move, the department is asking a federal court in San Antonio to require the state of Texas to obtain advance approval before putting future political redistricting changes in place.

The attorney general called the Voting Rights Act "the cornerstone of modern civil rights law" and said that "we cannot allow the slow unraveling of the progress that so many, throughout history, have sacrificed so much to achieve."
News from The Associated Press
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2013, 09:12 AM
 
8,275 posts, read 7,944,929 times
Reputation: 12122
Sounds lawless to me. The Supreme Court was pretty clear on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Houston
1,473 posts, read 2,150,130 times
Reputation: 1047
re-distrcting should never be in the hands of politicans to began with..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Kaufman County, Texas
11,853 posts, read 26,868,308 times
Reputation: 10602
Quote:
Originally Posted by War Beagle View Post
The Supreme Court was pretty clear on this.
SCOTUS has spoken, and DOJ needs to realized they have been overruled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,268 posts, read 35,630,016 times
Reputation: 8617
Either you have redistricting oversight for all states, or for none.

But I have to agree, politicians doing the redistricting is a travesty.

Divide the state up into a grid and make districts based on the grid, or else use zip codes - make the post office useful for something
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 10:23 AM
 
Location: Texas State Fair
8,560 posts, read 11,212,862 times
Reputation: 4258
Quote:
Originally Posted by rynetwo View Post
What do you think folks?




News from The Associated Press
One thousand +++ days tooooo many, to go.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Maui County, HI
4,131 posts, read 7,442,568 times
Reputation: 3391
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainwreck20 View Post
Either you have redistricting oversight for all states, or for none.

But I have to agree, politicians doing the redistricting is a travesty.

Divide the state up into a grid and make districts based on the grid, or else use zip codes - make the post office useful for something

Then each district would have a different population
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,268 posts, read 35,630,016 times
Reputation: 8617
Quote:
Then each district would have a different population
Not one-to-one correlation, but just by blocks - 5 low density blocks in one district would be equal to a 1 block high density voting district. Ofc, if the blocks were small enough, then you could still gerrymander, but maybe have an adjacency requirement, as well - each additional block would have to be adjacent to as many other blocks in the district as possible (i.e. you could not leave holes and could not build 'spikes').

This is just off-the-cuff, nothing specific, but it would be nice to have the districts not quite so homogeneous.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 06:58 PM
 
Location: Austin
75 posts, read 173,647 times
Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristieP View Post
SCOTUS has spoken, and DOJ needs to realized they have been overruled.
Actually, since the Texas Legislature was found to have intentionally discriminated when it drew congressional and legislative redistricting maps way back in 2011, the DOJ is saying that evidence should be enough to subject the state to a “bail in” provision that the Supreme Court left in the federal Voting Rights Act, just for this situation.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2013, 08:26 PM
 
2,206 posts, read 4,747,091 times
Reputation: 2104
Eric Holder will either be pardoned by Obama or in jail in in 2018. The surveillance apparatus he built and the gun running into Mexico both open him up to civil suits once he is no longer AG. A pardon will not protect him from a civil suit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top