Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-21-2020, 04:47 AM
 
Location: The Dirty South.
1,624 posts, read 2,035,072 times
Reputation: 1241

Advertisements

Which area do you think is more dangerous? Both areas have high crime for the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-21-2020, 10:27 AM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,319 posts, read 5,478,374 times
Reputation: 12278
Killeen has higher crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2020, 11:27 AM
 
Location: WA
5,439 posts, read 7,726,033 times
Reputation: 8538
Waco also has a lot of more upscale suburban areas that are relatively free of crime, mostly to the south and west in Hewitt, Woodway, China Spring, etc. It's mostly the central city and poorer areas that have higher crime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2020, 11:49 AM
 
2,295 posts, read 2,367,680 times
Reputation: 2668
Aside from the crime rates, the two areas are entirely different. Waco is a city, and as such, looks like one. There is a downtown, and to some degree, suburbs. There has been a lot of recent gentrification in downtown Waco over the recent years. Killeen, in contrast, is a more of a town, which comprises only a part of what is commonly referred to as the Centroplex, consisting of Killeen, Copperas Cove, Harker Heights, Belton, and Temple. Killeen indeed has a higher crime rate than Waco, however, this should not be the sole factor considered when looking at the area. I lived in the area on three separate occasions, and each time chose to live in Belton, or Temple. It's a short commute, the schools are better, lower crime rates, less traffic (depending on where you live), etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2020, 06:43 PM
 
23,688 posts, read 9,369,016 times
Reputation: 8652
I would figure Killeen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-09-2020, 11:55 PM
 
738 posts, read 764,262 times
Reputation: 1581
There's very little random violent crime anymore. Your about three times more likely to die in a car accident than be murdered in the U.S. Unless you have an abusive home life, get in bar fights, or are involved in the drug trade your odds of being a victim of any sort of violent crime are much lower. So "safe" for the average person is a place with good medical care, short commute times, and good ems service. In other words a city. It's why urban life expectancy is higher in the U.S.

Most differentiation in crime rates is due to poverty rates, population distribution, and reporting. For instance I'd bet Killeen has a higher crime rate because it's the commercial hub for a giant army base with a large population. When the sliver of privates that get into bar fights get recorded it goes on Killeen. However, Killeen doesn't have the people on the base counted when you divide total crimes by population. This is why crime rates are higher in downtown or entertainment areas. You can easily have an actual population(and the crime that goes with it) many multiples higher than the residential population. For instance Downtown Corpus Christi has a daytime population of nearly 30,000(tourists and office workers) but an actual residential population of around 2500.

Some cities and counties will also log some crime types on the city/zip code where the crime was reported even if it didn't happen there. How do log the location of a cyber crime for example? Lots of places will put it on where the report was generated, usually the police headquarters or county courthouse and those are usually in the center of the biggest city on the county.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-08-2021, 02:39 PM
 
Location: Unknown
570 posts, read 559,617 times
Reputation: 684
Both suck. Waco is the better option but thats not saying much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top