Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-29-2021, 02:06 PM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,891,217 times
Reputation: 7643

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by malcorub16 View Post
Here you go, more updated photos.


That's STILL not an updated photo of Austin...

EDIT: people already pointed that out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-29-2021, 03:02 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,447 posts, read 15,466,742 times
Reputation: 18992
I visit SA often though living in the Austin MSA and I feel that the downtown area of SA is larger than Austin's. And in all honesty, despite the dated buildings SA has always been preferred by me over downtown Austin. I just love the culture, history and vibe of SA and despite being a tourist trap, I find the riverwalk to be a stroke of civil engineering genius. SA is a very unique city.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2021, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Houston
5,612 posts, read 4,932,339 times
Reputation: 4553
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
I visit SA often though living in the Austin MSA and I feel that the downtown area of SA is larger than Austin's. And in all honesty, despite the dated buildings SA has always been preferred by me over downtown Austin. I just love the culture, history and vibe of SA and despite being a tourist trap, I find the riverwalk to be a stroke of civil engineering genius. SA is a very unique city.
It's easily the most "charming" of Texas' large city downtowns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-29-2021, 09:21 PM
 
Location: Austin, Texas
1,985 posts, read 3,317,371 times
Reputation: 1705
Quote:
Originally Posted by NBTX11 View Post
Skylines have nothing to do with whose bigger. That just means they built more towers, that's it. That's literally it. One city decided to build more buildings. Skylines come in all shapes and sizes. Large cities like San Antonio and Phoenix haven't built that many of them, whereas Austin has. But, I have always known that SA was bigger than Austin. Going off a skyline alone is a very poor way to judge city size.

You could have a city of 100,000 decide to build a bunch of 50 story towers. Does that make them a big city???
No one said it’s what makes a city bigger. The question was why do people feel that Austin is the bigger city. And a major contributor to that, in my opinion, is because the skyline is taller and denser. Most regular everyday people couldn’t name the 10 largest cities in the United States, let alone their order of size. Heck, I bet a massive chunk of Texans couldn’t list the 5 or 6 largest cities in the state in their order.

But I bet you anything there’s a strong correlation between the size and height of a city’s skyline with how large a normal person perceives that city’s population to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 12:18 AM
 
5,673 posts, read 7,447,646 times
Reputation: 2740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinite101 View Post
No one said it’s what makes a city bigger. The question was why do people feel that Austin is the bigger city. And a major contributor to that, in my opinion, is because the skyline is taller and denser. Most regular everyday people couldn’t name the 10 largest cities in the United States, let alone their order of size. Heck, I bet a massive chunk of Texans couldn’t list the 5 or 6 largest cities in the state in their order.

But I bet you anything there’s a strong correlation between the size and height of a city’s skyline with how large a normal person perceives that city’s population to be.
Uhh...Yes they would..The Big 6 is obvious to Texans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 09:04 AM
 
Location: Austin, TX
15,268 posts, read 35,619,033 times
Reputation: 8614
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasboi View Post
Uhh...Yes they would..The Big 6 is obvious to Texans.
Yeah, although I did have to think about the order a bit - I usually think of the size of an area by its metro. Fort Worth and Austin are withing 100k, which I wouldn't have guessed off-hand. And San Antonino is bigger than Dallas, which I might have put the other way if I hadn't been looking up stuff on this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Unknown
570 posts, read 559,617 times
Reputation: 684
Easy.

1. Houston
2. San Antonio
3. Dallas
4. Austin
5. Fort Worth
6. El Paso.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 05:27 PM
 
245 posts, read 235,950 times
Reputation: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinite101 View Post
No one said it’s what makes a city bigger. The question was why do people feel that Austin is the bigger city. And a major contributor to that, in my opinion, is because the skyline is taller and denser. Most regular everyday people couldn’t name the 10 largest cities in the United States, let alone their order of size. Heck, I bet a massive chunk of Texans couldn’t list the 5 or 6 largest cities in the state in their order.

But I bet you anything there’s a strong correlation between the size and height of a city’s skyline with how large a normal person perceives that city’s population to be.
Virtually all Texans know that Houston, San Antonio, Dallas, Austin, Fort Worth, and El Paso are the 6 largest cities in Texas. I didn't even look up populations when writing this either.

Aslo, some people may PERCEIVE city size to be based on a skyline, however, what I said was that was a POOR way to decide city size. Very poor. Literally some cities have decided to build more buildings than other cities. That has zero to do with how big they are. I can name tons of cities that are smaller that have impressive skylines, and tons of bigger ones that have smaller skylines. Take a look at Phoenix, for example. Phoenix has 5 million people, metro, and they have hardly any towers. Are they any less improtant, or perceived as less important or smaller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 05:53 PM
 
Location: San Diego CA>Tijuana, BC>San Antonio, TX
6,497 posts, read 7,525,332 times
Reputation: 6873
Quote:
Originally Posted by NBTX11 View Post
Are they any less improtant, or perceived as less important or smaller.
In contrast, cities like San Francisco are smaller in population/landmass with a more impressive population than bigger cities like say San Antonio, Ft. Worth and Jacksonville.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2021, 06:00 PM
 
245 posts, read 235,950 times
Reputation: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by malcorub16 View Post
In contrast, cities like San Francisco are smaller in population/landmass with a more impressive population than bigger cities like say San Antonio, Ft. Worth and Jacksonville.
Yes, my point is simply this. Looking at a skyline and judging a cities size based off that, is one of the poorest ways to judge a city size. I could give countless examples. Fort Worth has a weak skyline for a city of it's size. But Ft. Worth is a very large city. El Paso has hardly any towers. I mean El Paso could build 100 50 story towers in the next 10 years, did they suddenly become a big city? Austin decided to build some, great for them, but they didn't suddenly become a 7 million person metro.

Personally, I like both San Antonio and Austin's skylines. Austin is sleek and modern, and SA is classic and looks wonderful also. SA has some great buildings like the Tower Life. I didn't once think man, Austin must be 5x bigger than SA, simply by looking at a skyline. Maybe someone else did. SA will never have a lot of towers, because they don't want buildings overpowering the Alamo and Riverwalk. Does that make them less important or smaller.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top