Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:50 PM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
You refuse and do what, instead?
Go solar with battery backups like I did
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:55 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,202,565 times
Reputation: 29353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Go solar with battery backups like I did

Do you find that cost effective? I was talking with a friend tonight who is in the energy business as a supply forecaster and his views are mixed. On one hand, there are good tax breaks right now that will not be there in a few years so the time is now if that's your plan. On the other hand, there can be delays in getting permits and the grid is not buying back at a decent rate, and storage is still pretty limited. Can your battery backups power you for 24 hours?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 08:58 PM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Do you find that cost effective? I was talking with a friend tonight who is in the energy business as a supply forecaster and his views are mixed. On one hand, there are good tax breaks right now that will not be there in a few years so the time is now if that's your plan. On the other hand, there can be delays in getting permits and the grid is not buying back at a decent rate, and storage is still pretty limited. Can your battery backups power you for 24 hours?
Cost effective? No. I have other reasons for doing it though.

Backup power for 24 hours? I have 3 batteries so yes.. and longer.. especially if I'm still receiving sunlight because my system is designed to produce more than I consume, which isn't the typical solar system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 09:05 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,202,565 times
Reputation: 29353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Cost effective? No. I have other reasons for doing it though.

Backup power for 24 hours? I have 3 batteries so yes.. and longer.. especially if I'm still receiving sunlight because my system is designed to produce more than I consume, which isn't the typical solar system.

Ok so you're going for the island strategy. It *can* work but it comes at a price. Not sure where you are at but my friend is sure the supply constraint in TX is slowly easing and about additional 800kw is scheduled to come online every month through the end of 2023. By 2024 they will be have to artificially keep capacity offline. Prices will be lower in 12-24 months than they are today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-25-2022, 11:26 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,447 posts, read 15,466,742 times
Reputation: 18992
Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
You refuse and do what, instead?
I refuse and keep digging, as I intend to enter not more than a 12 month contract.

ETA - found a plan that is 14 per kWh for 12 months or 13 per kWh for 24 months with a 125 cancellation fee. I may just do the 24 to save a few dollars.

Sheesh...still more than the 8.6 per kWh hour I was paying, but it'll do.

Last edited by riaelise; 07-25-2022 at 11:52 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2022, 01:31 PM
 
15,403 posts, read 7,464,179 times
Reputation: 19335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hashtag View Post
Deregulation isn't the culprit for unreliability, it's the fact that Texas recently have shutdown numerous coal powered plants in favor of windmills.

To shut down those power plants, was a huge mistake.
Deregulation is directly responsible for unreliability. When electric utilities were regulated, the PUC could mandate extra capacity and other reliability items, and the cost went into the rate base to be recovered from customers.

The State and ERCOT had nothing to do with the coal fired plants closing. Those plants closed because utilities, especially Luminant, made bad choices. Electricity prices were based on natural gas costs, which were higher than coal costs, so the coal plants would be extremely profitable. Unfortunately for Luminant, the fracking boom made gas prices drop, and the coal fired plants became extremely unprofitable. Portions of Luminant went bankrupt because of that, and the plants were closed. No big loss, those plants burned lignite, a really nasty type of coal that created a lot of pollution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2022, 01:32 PM
 
15,403 posts, read 7,464,179 times
Reputation: 19335
Quote:
Originally Posted by Need4Camaro View Post
Would be nice if in some way they could still utilize those plants in peak usage scenarios to bring extra capacity where rolling blackouts may occur otherwise. Then shut them back down when we are within reasonable margin of supply vs demand. I’m sure it’s not that easy but it would at least allow us to retain reliability if it could be done.
The coal plants that closed cannot be reopened. The mines were also closed.

Coal plants cannot be used as peaking plants, as they take 24 hours or more to come online. Coal plants are useful only for baseload
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2022, 07:47 AM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930
Quote:
Originally Posted by LF2Better View Post
I’m not saying this to be critical of your investment, but I know from doing my own pricing of battery back up solar systems that if you have 3 batteries, it is absolutely not cost effective. It sounds like you have other priorities than cost which obviously make sense for you.
I already stated it wasn’t cost effective.

Cost effective is throwing up a $5k Generac Whole House Backup Generator.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2022, 01:05 PM
 
11,778 posts, read 7,989,264 times
Reputation: 9930
I have to admit, this is pretty dumb.

https://www.texastribune.org/2022/08...s-wind-energy/

Why are we throwing up wind turbines and not upgrading transmission infrastructure to get the additional power where’s it’s needed? What good are all those turbines if much of the energy is isolated to the High Plains?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top