Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-17-2022, 11:22 PM
 
6 posts, read 6,870 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

We know if people take public transportation, the total energy consumption is lower than if people drive their own cars. I assume this is also true if people go to public libraries or malls to get cool air instead of staying at home. But is there any research to prove this? Thanks.
(This is not a discussion about how much freedom people lose, or it only works during the day, for certain people, etc. I'm only asking if such research has been done. It's hard to google because I can't find good keywords to search with.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-17-2022, 11:29 PM
 
11,775 posts, read 7,986,237 times
Reputation: 9925
Not sure. My energy bill went up by about $100 a month when I transitioned from going to the office to WFH, buf I’m also running more equipment and have the A/C set lower to keep certain rooms cool.

I will say though, it’s not cheap keeping a large room full of equipment and people cool. You’re fighting outside temperatures as well as heat generating sources inside (including people, we do generate heat).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 04:49 AM
 
18,122 posts, read 25,262,858 times
Reputation: 16822
At least in Texas, more electricity is going to be used
I already mentioned in a different post that we are told to raise our thermostats at home to reduce the electrical consumption in Texas
But then you go to stores and they seem to make their buildings very cold to attract customers.

Something you can look into is if a 30 ton a/c unit uses as much electricity as ten 3 ton units.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 07:40 AM
 
1,108 posts, read 527,805 times
Reputation: 2534
Single 30 ton unit is more efficient that 10 units. But with 10 units you have redundancy. The only way multiple units would be more efficient is if there is a computer system that would shed the units off/on for 30 min periods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 04:11 PM
 
18,122 posts, read 25,262,858 times
Reputation: 16822
But we multiple units is easier to have 10 different areas with 10 different temperatures
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 06:28 PM
 
1,108 posts, read 527,805 times
Reputation: 2534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
But we multiple units is easier to have 10 different areas with 10 different temperatures

Sure is but are you were asking if one large unit is more efficient than 10 smaller ones and its not as efficient in total- not that i would know having been a HVAC contractor for 40 years designing and installing all kinds of havc systems.

As far a zoning as you were referring to there all all kinds of zone control systems that can be added to provide different temperatures in different areas using one big unit. Thats is a typical way large building are installed and operated due to the added cost of electrical, structural, plumbing and space requirements. Not to mention the added cost of maintenance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-18-2022, 07:11 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,687 posts, read 57,985,728 times
Reputation: 46166
My Texas library greatly reduced hours for Covid, and will never restore hours that working or school age could use the library, because staff now likes to only work 10-4. Homeless have invaded the library and most conditioned indoor spaces. They spread human waste all over the walls of the restroom everyday. I don't see public spaces opening up for the community any time soon.

I remember the basement level community buildings of the 1950's prepared as Civil Defense shelters. They were pretty cool in summer and well stocked.

We've come a long ways.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2022, 09:27 AM
 
Location: Sunnybrook Farm
4,502 posts, read 2,646,853 times
Reputation: 12990
Ought to be pretty obvious.

The movie theater, the library, the shopping mall are going to be air-conditioned no matter what. If people are spending more time there than in their houses, and they're turning up the thermostat when they leave the house, less total electricity will be consumed. Yes, in theory the added load of people in those buildings should increase the power consumption there, but heat load from humans is going to be small in summer compared to solar heat load; and the AC systems of those giant buildings will be a lot more efficient than a myriad of small house systems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2022, 12:47 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,687 posts, read 57,985,728 times
Reputation: 46166
There is a lot of research in AZ and CA on reflective coatings for roads, parking and roofs.

Solar 'shade' would be reasonable in TX since the power grid, prices, and service are all poor.
Solar farms (using shade as commercial crop producing plots in hot / dry climates) are growing in popularity.

Ship the TX heat to MN in a heat capsule that takes 6 months to arrive.

For individual conditioned spaces, look to Asia and Middle East for very economical solutions they invented and have been using for 50 yrs.

You can always go Snow Skiing at the Snow covered ski slope in the Dubai shopping center. (Bring a coat, or rent one)

Very large and spacious commercial centers (as is that one) could be successful at cooling the masses, but don't count on USA residents to turn down the thermostat when they leave. Often it is best to maintain a comfortable temp while absent, rather than allow the mass of a building structure to heat up, then try to cool it back down.

Back in the 1970's we usually built homes with a 'cool-tube' (Underground convection source @ 50F temperatures)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2022, 01:50 PM
 
19,767 posts, read 18,050,613 times
Reputation: 17245
IMO per reasons rabbit33 outlined large aggregated cooling spaces don't make a lot of sense.



Also most people have all of this wrong. I don't have the info. in front of my face, I'm on my boat/bad internet, but IIRC per a crew of Ph.D types from Univ. of Michigan performed an energy use study comparing Minneapolis (by a fair bit the coldest large city in the US) and Miami (by quite a bit the hottest/most humid/most AC dependent city in the US).............3.5x more energy is required per square foot to heat spaces in Minneapolis per year than to cool and dehumidify the same in Miami.



After I dock for the night I'll link the study.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top