Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:20 AM
 
Location: The Bayou City
3,231 posts, read 4,564,671 times
Reputation: 1472

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meow23 View Post
250,000? that's smaller than the population of most of surrounding cities in DFW
Exactly.. And this guy thinks Houston shouldn't of built a port or refineries just so those 250k visitors to the San jacinto monument don't have to look at them. How ridiculous.

 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:35 AM
JJG
 
Location: Fort Worth
13,612 posts, read 22,904,705 times
Reputation: 7643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meow23 View Post
250,000? that's smaller than the population of most of surrounding cities in DFW
...most?

Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex

^^^ I only count 4, there.
 
Old 10-22-2014, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Willowbend/Houston
13,384 posts, read 25,747,031 times
Reputation: 10592
Quote:
Originally Posted by majicdonjuan View Post
While I agree with most of this and that DFW is certainly not a regional hub, allow me to add a few more things to your post above.

DFW-Amsterdam is seasonal and it's a question mark whether it will return for the summer, especially with all of the Middle East carriers planning DFW.

Unless you have some inside info, my understanding is that DFW-PEK isn't official yet because the slots that AA requested have not been secured. If AA gets it's planned slots then I expect this route to be flown. If it does not (and good slot allocations at PEK are notoriously difficult to get) then it may be dropped until such time as better slots can be obtained. I still expect this route to get the green light with that said.

You left off IAH-SVG as well.

And another point to be made is this - IAH has a lot more international origin/destination demand than DFW. Significantly more. That's why IAH has nearly double the number of international flag carriers than DFW (17 to 12).

DFW has the extra domestic traffic primarily due to the critical mass of AA's superhub (which is enabled by the location of DFW). The international flight expansion going on now - those flights are going to primarily fill up with low-yield connections.

IAH, on the other hand, has legendary front cabin demand that, to certain international markets, is amongst the highest in the industry and the airport as a whole has the extra international traffic primarily because of demand. IAH was as of 2012 the highest yielding hub airport in the country (I'd have to look up more recent data). AA picked growing DFW over trying to grow ORD (a good choice in my opinion since they are the clear second banana at ORD and the airport is constrained). UA picked growing ORD over IAH (and arguable choice since ORD is the bigger market and UA is the carrier with the most Chicago market share, but more room to grow and faster growing at IAH). So the international flags came in and picked up traffic where UA wouldn't. DFW operates differently, even the head of the airport said that whenever they want to attract a new route they try to convince AA to fly it first. HAS doesn't care who flies a new route.

By the way if you also add Mexico, Canada, and the Caribbean, IAH's lead in international destinations significantly increases. Even without Mexico you left off Bonaire, Port of Spain, Quito, Aruba (seasonal) and likely others from IAH's list. And then there's Mexico, which further grows the gap (and I've never understood why Mexican international traffic always gets left out of these conversations - it's international.) The gap is a bit bigger than you're giving credit for.

Houston has long been and will continue to be a larger international destination than DFW for a variety of reasons, most of which correspond to why DFW is a generally larger domestic destination.
I did forget Stavanger. Forgive me for that one.

Yes you are correct regarding DFW-Beijing. The slots have been requested and approved by the US government. They are still waiting on the Chinese government.

I dont disagree with most of what youre saying. I like the stats to speak for themselves. In 2013:

International O&D:
IAH: 4.1 million annual passengers
DFW: 2.9 million annual passengers

FYI, Austin and San Antonio are in the 500-600k range.

Domestic O&D:
DFW and DAL: 25 million annual passengers
IAH and HOU: 17.5 million annual passengers

Never once did I imply that DFW was more international than IAH, but it certainly isnt a regional hub. No way, no how. An example of regional hubs would be Salt Lake City, Phoenix, Charlotte, and Denver. Their global portfolios as well as their international O&D's are far smaller than DFW and IAH.

BTW, DFW has 13 international airlines. Thats not as many as IAH, but its more than cities like Seattle, Atlanta, and Philadelphia. Its not exactly as if were left without choices.
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,947,759 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasboi View Post
Its called the "Medical Center District ". No its nowhere near as big as TMC but Dallas is well equipped with good hospitals.
Exactly! UT Southwestern's new William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital is opening in November and The New Parkland Memorial Hospital is opening next year. These new facilities will make healthcare in Dallas even better.
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:03 AM
 
Location: The Bayou City
3,231 posts, read 4,564,671 times
Reputation: 1472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
Exactly! UT Southwestern's new William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital is opening in November and The New Parkland Memorial Hospital is opening next year. These new facilities will make healthcare in Dallas even better.
You guys act as if a number of health care institutions around the Texas medical center aren't currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars renovating facilities and building expansions to their master plans...
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:11 AM
 
Location: In your head, rent free
14,888 posts, read 10,035,501 times
Reputation: 7693
Quote:
Originally Posted by dallasboi View Post
Its called the "Medical Center District ". No its nowhere near as big as TMC but Dallas is well equipped with good hospitals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dallaz View Post
Exactly! UT Southwestern's new William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital is opening in November and The New Parkland Memorial Hospital is opening next year. These new facilities will make healthcare in Dallas even better.
There's nothing in Dallas that compares or even comes close to comparing to the Texas Medical Center in Houston. Number of hospitals, number of beds, level of critical care, number of doctors, amount of research... even parking spots.

Let's just not even talk about this anymore in this thread, it's not even worth comparing. You guys are throwing out names of Hospitals and we're talking about the largest medical center on the planet. The Texas Medical Center is the eighth-largest business district in the country after Philadelphia and Seattle.

Aside from the medical aspects of it the TMC is also world renown for it's sheer size and the mechanics behind it. The TMC is the home of the largest chilled water facility on the planet, that's used to keep the 7.2 MILLION visitors a year cool and comfortable.

Dallas has some good hospitals just like Honda makes some good cars, we don't compare the Honda accord to the BMW 7 series do we? No we don't.
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,947,759 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
There's nothing in Dallas that compares or even comes close to comparing to the Texas Medical Center in Houston. Number of hospitals, number of beds, level of critical care, number of doctors, amount of research... even parking spots.

Let's just not even talk about this anymore in this thread, it's not even worth comparing. You guys are throwing out names of Hospitals and we're talking about the largest medical center on the planet. The Texas Medical Center is the eighth-largest business district in the country after Philadelphia and Seattle.

Aside from the medical aspects of it the TMC is also world renown for it's sheer size and the mechanics behind it. The TMC is the home of the largest chilled water facility on the planet, that's used to keep the 7.2 MILLION visitors a year cool and comfortable.

Dallas has some good hospitals just like Honda makes some good cars, we don't compare the Honda accord to the BMW 7 series do we? No we don't.
When did I compare TMC to Dallas' SWMD? I said Dallas has new state of the art hospitals opening soon....
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:16 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,947,759 times
Reputation: 3449
Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasTallest View Post
You guys act as if a number of health care institutions around the Texas medical center aren't currently spending hundreds of millions of dollars renovating facilities and building expansions to their master plans...
I NEVER said they weren't!
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:22 AM
 
Location: Dallas,Texas
6,695 posts, read 9,947,759 times
Reputation: 3449
BTW there's a new Skyhouse planned for the Oak Lawn section of Dallas.
 
Old 10-22-2014, 09:24 AM
 
Location: Tysons Corner, VA by way of TEXAS
725 posts, read 1,240,852 times
Reputation: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello View Post
Ok, a few things should be pointed out.

Again, I work in the air industry and Im just going to let the numbers talk.

First, lets look at total number of international passengers in 2012:

IAH: 8.5 million
DFW: 5.8 million

Ok, now lets look at number of international passengers O&D passengers from 2013. O&D represents passengers going to or coming from DFW and IAH. These do NOT count connections:

IAH: 4.1 million
DFW: 2.9 million

Total number of international destinations served minus Mexico:

IAH: 47
DFW: 42

Total number of domestic destinations:


IAH: 93
DFW: 142

Total number of destinations in Mexico:

IAH: 35
DFW: 18

The numbers speak for themselves. IAH is more international, however DFW is quite global. The biggest difference in destination count is Mexico and Latin America. Thats it and thats all. As to why the discrepancy in passengers, its because of frequency. DFW-Guatemala City is a daily flight for example and IAH-Guatemala City is 3x daily. IAH-San Salvador is 4x daily and DFW-San Salvador is 10 weekly flights.
Total number of international destinations served minus Mexico:

IAH - 47 (2 destinations seasonal, AUA and NAS)
DFW - 37 (6 destinations seasonal, AMS, GIG, LIR, PUJ, GCM, and PLS)

Bigger difference than indicated.

Total number of domestic destinations:

IAH: 113 (12 seasonal)
DFW:145 (5 seasonal)

Smaller difference than indicated.

Last edited by majicdonjuan; 10-22-2014 at 09:34 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top