Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-11-2019, 09:25 AM
 
4,717 posts, read 3,265,237 times
Reputation: 12122

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DMChicago View Post
The worst airline is typically the last one you've flown.
Yeah, I've had issues with all of them at one time or another- wouldn't call any consistently worse than the others.

I have Lifetime Gold status on AA so usually take them, especially for domestic where I get free checked bags, priority boarding, etc. On transatlantics where I'm flying in Business so I get treated well anyway, I go by price, schedule and connections. I flew to Scotland on UA last October and got to use the Polaris Lounge in Chicago. Wow. Showers, nap areas, great food, open bar... they really put the Admiral's Club (which AA Business Class passengers use) to shame. Unfortunately, it was at the expense of the United Clubs which all other UA/CO passengers use- from what I've read, the new Polaris lounges in ORD and JFK were carved out of the older United Clubs, leaving very little space for people who had United Club access only.

This is a continuing theme, though- airlines keep upgrading their premium products to kiss up to high rollers and the rabble can just sit in the back, starve and develop deep vein thrombosis from being cramped into tiny seats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-11-2019, 09:38 AM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by athena53 View Post
This is a continuing theme, though- airlines keep upgrading their premium products to kiss up to high rollers and the rabble can just sit in the back, starve and develop deep vein thrombosis from being cramped into tiny seats.

Yep, and it won't change since domestic leisure travel is always going to book the cheapest possible flight even if it's 28" seat pitch and a fee for every "service" including carry-on baggage. The majors have to compete against the discount carriers and the only way they can do that is to run near-100% load factor in those tiny seats and slash labor costs in the back of the plane. It's a race to the bottom.


Personally, I think seat pitch needs to be regulated. 14.5% of American males are over 6 feet tall. 31" should be the absolute minimum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 11:21 AM
 
7,759 posts, read 3,879,408 times
Reputation: 8851
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
I'm 6'2" with broad shoulders. I don't fit in the seat. Economy Plus is fine if the middle seat is open.
Personally I would not accept a Sales or high travel position because of this. I'm 6'1 and my circulation is not clinically bad, but it's not good enough to endure economy anymore. My hats off to you, I could not do it for both physical and mental health reasons.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JONOV View Post
Delta did screw my plans up, twice, and they made it right by fixing their mistakes ASAP. But, I understand that they're not magicians either.

The debacle of dragging the Dr. off the plane and the ****zu in the overhead notwithstanding, most of their other problems are just bad luck or honest mistakes. The Veteran that had the toilet leak on his baggage? Really, its extremely unfortunate, but if it had been an investment banker flying from Chicago to Houston, it wouldn't be newsworthy. The Bunny Rabbit that died? I can't see how it was United that killed it. Etc...

As to Munoz...I think that enough customers, shareholders, and the board of directors would disagree of your assessment.
This is my point...United practically takes lawsuits to make the customer whole again.

I'm not talking about the rabbit. Mostly the dogs.

Bad luck? There's an equivalent chance of all this stuff happening to all airlines yet as I bolded in your comment - They take care of it before it gets out of hand.

The fact is that the shareholders DID agree with my assessment - United stock has repeatedly gone down particularly after Munoz fumbled announcements. And subsequently simply gotten bought up by those trying to get them cheaper and thinking they will ever correct course. Long term they have demonstrated they continue to intend to fly into the abyss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by athena53 View Post
This is a continuing theme, though- airlines keep upgrading their premium products to kiss up to high rollers and the rabble can just sit in the back, starve and develop deep vein thrombosis from being cramped into tiny seats.
This is why folks need to limit flying so they can feel the pain. Because the premium product isn't even that great. I would not call most modern day domestic first class short haul (3-4 hour) seats that much more comfortable aside from the increased pitch and legroom. The seat itself made my back hurt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffD View Post
Yep, and it won't change since domestic leisure travel is always going to book the cheapest possible flight even if it's 28" seat pitch and a fee for every "service" including carry-on baggage. The majors have to compete against the discount carriers and the only way they can do that is to run near-100% load factor in those tiny seats and slash labor costs in the back of the plane. It's a race to the bottom.

Personally, I think seat pitch needs to be regulated. 14.5% of American males are over 6 feet tall. 31" should be the absolute minimum.
Domestic leisure travel is optional. Tell Mom and Dad to SKPYE next X-Mas. Enough people do it, they'll shape up quick.

Regarding competition with the budget carriers - It's just a poor product/competition strategy. Why in the hell is UA trying to compete with no-name carriers? If the equivalent of these things happened on a no-name carrier nobody would care. It is preposterous that people feel it's OK for the #2 airline in the world to have these types of incidents and lawsuits occur regularly and that it is a sustainable business model or strategy.

Flight attendants used to be a lot more helpful and treated much better than they are in regards to working conditions, compensation and contracts. Perhaps they should start there as well as addressing the pilot shortage. Both their hard and soft product are slipping egregiously.

And to the other poster who said I shouldn't be commenting if I'm not a frequent flyer - Bull. I formulate opinions based on trends, data and all available information. It is irrelevant whether individually I have a good or bad experience with an airline or not. Based on the data United has more negative PR articles than any other carrier in the past 5 years. Objectively, it makes no sense they enjoy a lead over any other top 5 carrier. I would say the same thing about Delta if they had as many issues.

When reading about the goofs of Delta they pale in comparison to United in terms of number and the nature of the incident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 11:26 AM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,487,571 times
Reputation: 59602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tencent View Post
And to the other poster who said I shouldn't be commenting if I'm not a frequent flyer - Bull.
I assume you're referring to me. I didn't say you shouldn't be commenting. Go ahead and comment all you want. But don't tell me (or anyone else) how WE should be conducting their own travel. Again ... YOU DO YOU.

I can't figure out why someone who only flies maybe a couple of times a year is so wrapped around the axle about this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 12:08 PM
 
7,759 posts, read 3,879,408 times
Reputation: 8851
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
I assume you're referring to me. I didn't say you shouldn't be commenting. Go ahead and comment all you want. But don't tell me (or anyone else) how WE should be conducting their own travel. Again ... YOU DO YOU.

I can't figure out why someone who only flies maybe a couple of times a year is so wrapped around the axle about this.
You're just a rabble rouser, well I'm not falling for the bait.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 12:20 PM
 
5,462 posts, read 3,032,982 times
Reputation: 3271
United is bad, but not as bad as its made out to be. They still enjoy a good image. Every airline tries to be profitable, United is no different. Poor seats, no entertainment but thats the norm across many of the airlines. Looks like you are in the 70;s and expecting to be treated royally or as shown in the TV Ads.

I am the "minority" that you mentioned which United supposedly hates but never received any bad treatment.

Also I am in IAH area and hate their monopoly, but still get fair prices.

I hope they dont ask the Dreamliner passenger to download the app and watch in on phone
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 12:52 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
~2 flights a year = Fake news (maybe listening to national news ! REALLY FAKE!)

Thanks for the enlightenment.

Be careful who / what you listen to. It is SO easy to find CORRECT information from regular passengers (Points guy / road warriors / Mileage hounds... all have forums and people who fly 2-10 flights per week. )

4 flights this week. I have had days with 8 - 10 flights (mileage hound). There are HERDS of us (not complaining), yet living it DAILY (work and play).

Go take a few flights and check back in!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 01:15 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,487,571 times
Reputation: 59602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tencent View Post
You're just a rabble rouser, well I'm not falling for the bait.
I'M the rabble rouser?? Hello, Pot! LOL!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 01:16 PM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,487,571 times
Reputation: 59602
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
United is bad, but not as bad as its made out to be. They still enjoy a good image. Every airline tries to be profitable, United is no different. Poor seats, no entertainment but thats the norm across many of the airlines. Looks like you are in the 70;s and expecting to be treated royally or as shown in the TV Ads.
They provide entertainment, just not the devices. Lots of movies and TV shows.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-11-2019, 01:17 PM
 
24,557 posts, read 18,230,382 times
Reputation: 40260
Quote:
Originally Posted by shanv3 View Post
I hope they dont ask the Dreamliner passenger to download the app and watch in on phone

Why not? It's just an airplane like any other. If you're sitting in steerage on a steeply discounted ticket, watch on your phone. I normally have 10 movies on my iPhone to watch if I don't like the airline content. Any Blu Ray I buy has the slip of paper for the digital copy and I download Amazon Prime free movies. I can also toss a DVD in my laptop.



On my iPhone, iMessage and my Apple news feed both work without having to pay United any money for an internet connection. Last night, I was texting my girlfriend and reading my news feed for much of my 3 h 10 minute flight. I was thinking about watching Amazon Prime Hunt for Red October on my phone but never got to it. The weekly feed from The Economist for my online subscription is available for download on Thursdays so I opted to read that instead of watching a movie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top