Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-22-2020, 07:40 AM
 
16,414 posts, read 12,487,571 times
Reputation: 59602

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Geek View Post
Even if she looks great, she broke the well published and advertised rules. Sorry lady, no entry for you.
She's not taking issue with the rules. She's taking issue with the double standard in how the rules are enforced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2020, 07:46 AM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
Simple... Kick out the hubby and move on (following the published rules).


Media seeker victim.
The world is full of them and airlines are a common target.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 07:51 AM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,518 posts, read 34,807,002 times
Reputation: 73728
I'm on the fence. If they followed their published rules then I side with the company.

On the other hand, I think she looks fine. What if some 60 year old lady came in wearing a velour track suit (very common)?
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 08:40 AM
 
1,478 posts, read 1,512,946 times
Reputation: 3411
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
She's not taking issue with the rules. She's taking issue with the double standard in how the rules are enforced.
Exactly this. It’s not a discussion about whether her outfit was appropriate or not, it’s why they let her husband in with his rule breaking outfit but denied her. It’s not about the outfit. It’s about the gender discrimination.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:06 PM
 
1,524 posts, read 1,181,563 times
Reputation: 3194
Quote:
Originally Posted by hertfordshire View Post
She's not taking issue with the rules. She's taking issue with the double standard in how the rules are enforced.
She is, now. But at first, her beef was simply about the rules:

Quote:
"In 2020 @qantas airlines Melbourne won’t allow a woman holding a business class ticket to enter their business class lounge in active wear," Coyle, who was wearing an orange athletic jumpsuit at the time, tweeted about her experience. "My business IS fitness and an active lifestyle. Qantas prefers their women in a dress. #genderdiscrimination #qantas."
Something made her change her tune from the original tweet to her amended "complaint."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:16 PM
 
1,156 posts, read 940,137 times
Reputation: 3599
Oh no she had a problem with the business class lounge? Don't tell me she had to mingle with all the commoners in the regular cattle pen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Østenfor sol og vestenfor måne
17,916 posts, read 24,336,832 times
Reputation: 39037
The rules clearly state that "head-to-toe exercise clothing" is prohibited, so there is that. Both of their outfits violate that rule so there is clearly a case of gender discrimination here since he was let in while she was prohibited.

That said, what a ****ty, classist rule. They both look more than decent in clean, well-fitted clothes. They don't look like slobs, not obscene. Not my style, but who am I to judge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:28 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCal25 View Post
Oh no she had a problem with the business class lounge? Don't tell me she had to mingle with all the commoners in the regular cattle pen.
They could have 're-booked her on United... That'll teach her to 'complain'.

Qantas certainly should not host an unhappy passenger on a long international flight. (security risk)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:33 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,690 posts, read 57,994,855 times
Reputation: 46171
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQConvict View Post
The rules clearly state that "head-to-toe exercise clothing" is prohibited, so there is that. Both of their outfits violate that rule so there is clearly a case of gender discrimination here since he was let in while she was prohibited.

That said, what a ****ty, classist rule. They both look more than decent in clean, well-fitted clothes. They don't look like slobs, not obscene. Not my style, but who am I to judge.
but how did they smell?

BTW, 'he' was not head-to-toe (Billboard material), he 'broke up the wear with the shorts. I can see a lounge employee quickly missing that correlation.

"Just following the rules ma'am, You're OUTTA here, scram before I have you arrested..." (And why I am not in a Customer Service Role). " Oh, you don't like the rules?, whoops, you just got cancelled from your flight. See ya, have a nice trip finding an alternative way home!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2020, 01:43 PM
 
17,539 posts, read 13,324,825 times
Reputation: 32981
Quote:
Originally Posted by fluffythewondercat View Post
No doubt she did it deliberately to draw attention to herself. Social media diva.

That's not the issue. She was dressed appropriately for a comfortable flight.


In my 30 years of 2-4 flights a week, I've seen much worse (men and women) 300 pounders trying to mash themselves into the same outfit she's wearing, skirts so high that belly buttons were showing, men with tees that wouldn't cover there bellies and shorts that were so short that their johnsons were on display


Look around next time you are in the airport and airport lounges
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Travel

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top