Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Unless she was convicted of some other felony before this trial, she is not a convicted felon.
Her best bet without a college degree is probably in Cali.
Yes, there are convicted felons who are lawyers.
As long as the check clears or she gets financial aid, damn near anyplace will accept her as long as she meets the prereqs. That is the part that is going to be her problem--not her recent arrest.
After reading this thread up to now, I would say that most of the posters have already forgotten that the woman was found Not Guilty by a jury of her peers. Some keep saying she is a convicted felon. When will you people realize that we don't hold trials by mobs because they just wouldn't be fair at all.
Hey, I might not be so happy with the verdict but the jury made it and according to our laws they had final say. You people who think you should have been part of the mob that killed her because someone yelled kill her are the very reason we have to do these things the way we do.
r u one of those guys proposing marriage to ca cause she may get rich or have you lost your mind????
After reading this thread up to now, I would say that most of the posters have already forgotten that the woman was found Not Guilty by a jury of her peers. Some keep saying she is a convicted felon. When will you people realize that we don't hold trials by mobs because they just wouldn't be fair at all.
Hey, I might not be so happy with the verdict but the jury made it and according to our laws they had final say. You people who think you should have been part of the mob that killed her because someone yelled kill her are the very reason we have to do these things the way we do.
Just because the jury found her not guilty based on a lack of physical evidence....doesn't mean the public has to go all retarded and pretend she isn't guilty. If she hadn't lied to the police, they would've found the body sooner and they would have had cause of death.
She threw all her family and anyone else she could think of under the bus, so who do you think she was really trying to protect by lying?
After reading this thread up to now, I would say that most of the posters have already forgotten that the woman was found Not Guilty by a jury of her peers. Some keep saying she is a convicted felon. When will you people realize that we don't hold trials by mobs because they just wouldn't be fair at all.
Hey, I might not be so happy with the verdict but the jury made it and according to our laws they had final say. You people who think you should have been part of the mob that killed her because someone yelled kill her are the very reason we have to do these things the way we do.
I was saying she's a ex-criminal... she spent a long time in jail. I don't know why you quoted me and assumed all those things about me...
Mason says that Casey is very sharp and read nearly all of the 28,000 documents throughout the trial.
"She's very smart," he said. She even told him what she would like to do as a career.
Mason added, "She told me, 'When I get out, I want to be a lawyer. When I get out, I want to work in your office.' That's not realistic with the record she has now."
Yeah she wants to continue her parasitic lifestyle by "working" in Mason's office ... preferably near where the business checks are kept!
Even Mason doesn't think it's a good idea. LOL!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.