Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
i still don't think most people would want to live that life at the expense of their family, but i could be wrong......
people change, but it is not always for the better. does ANYONE think she is a nicer person now, a better wife now, or a better mother now, or is she just richer?
I think most people would not risk the safety and privacy of their small children for money and fame, but sometimes money and fame can change people's minds. Kate is a prime example.
i still don't think most people would want to live that life at the expense of their family, but i could be wrong......
people change, but it is not always for the better. does ANYONE think she is a nicer person now, a better wife now, or a better mother now, or is she just richer?
Yep, and I am happy with my comfortable (far from rich) life if that means that my kids don't call me by the babysitters name and I don't have to pretend I'm having a nice time at my kids birthday parties. I actually KNOW the parents of my kids friends and don't have to bring along wardrobe changes for a little kids party.
Oh, not only are they having them....Anna was all torn up that it took SO LONG . WTF?
I'd say what I think was probably the problem in why it took so long but it would probably get cut by the mod's.
Oh heck, it's Monday.....
I'm gonna guess that neither of them had much in the way of sex ed. To put it nicely............ It took awhile for them to figure out what went where and how.
I'd say what I think was probably the problem in why it took so long but it would probably get cut by the mod's.
Oh heck, it's Monday.....
I'm gonna guess that neither of them had much in the way of sex ed. To put it nicely............ It took awhile for them to figure out what went where and how.
If that is the case, then they must not understand how it works. Anna said that she had taken pregnancy tests before and been disappointed that they were negative. They were married for 4 WHOLE months before conceiving.
If that is the case, then they must not understand how it works. Anna said that she had taken pregnancy tests before and been disappointed that they were negative. They were married for 4 WHOLE months before conceiving.
How sad. I know I know- their life, not mine, but I find it really sad. The two barely knew each other when they got married and now will have only a bit more than a year together to learn about each other as a couple before children add on to the matter. And so much of their interaction is going to just be about the pregnancy.
now that little scenario did sort of creep me out. The whole "josh reveals the answer to anna on camera" bit. For one thing, what if the result was negative? I'd have killed my husband in cold blood if he set me up for that kind of disappointment on camera. With that, Josh doesn't seem like the type to do that to his wife....so she had to know it was positive and therefore, the whole thing was stupid.
Oh, not only are they having them....Anna was all torn up that it took SO LONG . WTF?
they'd been married 4 months and she was talking about being disappointed so many times! Does she ovulate at warp speed or something?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
