U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-07-2012, 01:18 PM
 
26 posts, read 116,386 times
Reputation: 29

Advertisements

I am currently collecting benefits in Tier 2. My original claim expired on 6/16/12, and I received a "Notice of Determination of Invalid Claim, Section 1277", which, in my understanding, is a formality due to the fact I did not work at all during the past year, and that I will continue to collect on the EUC as I have been. I understand that completely.

Today I received a "Notice of Unemployment Insurance Award" for the period 6/17/2012 - 06/15/2013; it uses the income figures from my prior award, BUT shows a reduction in the benefit amount of $29.00 weekly.

Somehow, I had the impression from reading this conference that my EUC benefits would continue in the same amount as they had previously been, and, hopefully, they will.

What I don't understand is what the reduction in weekly benefit amount is all about?

As I always, I appreciate your help!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-07-2012, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,409 posts, read 55,579,484 times
Reputation: 22815
Quote:
Originally Posted by dennisdster View Post
I am currently collecting benefits in Tier 2. My original claim expired on 6/16/12, and I received a "Notice of Determination of Invalid Claim, Section 1277", which, in my understanding, is a formality due to the fact I did not work at all during the past year, and that I will continue to collect on the EUC as I have been. I understand that completely.

Today I received a "Notice of Unemployment Insurance Award" for the period 6/17/2012 - 06/15/2013; it uses the income figures from my prior award, BUT shows a reduction in the benefit amount of $29.00 weekly.

Somehow, I had the impression from reading this conference that my EUC benefits would continue in the same amount as they had previously been, and, hopefully, they will.

What I don't understand is what the reduction in weekly benefit amount is all about?

As I always, I appreciate your help!
It appears your state has opened a new claim for you at a benefit $29 lower than the other. Conflicting letters at the bye are common, but on its face it appears for some reason you qualify for a new claim.

It is possible your state has made an error. You need to call them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-07-2012, 04:32 PM
 
26 posts, read 116,386 times
Reputation: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariadne22 View Post
It appears your state has opened a new claim for you at a benefit $29 lower than the other. Conflicting letters at the bye are common, but on its face it appears for some reason you qualify for a new claim.

It is possible your state has made an error. You need to call them.
Thank you yet again, Ariadne22; your help is very much appreciated!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 05:11 PM
 
1 posts, read 353 times
Reputation: 10
I have been collecting unemployment since December but filled my original claim last February so I re applied like I was instructed to do. I have a phone interview on 3/09/2016 "There is a question about your eligibility". Is this going to place my payments on hold until after the interview? My next certification is this Sunday. Also what's there to question nothing has changed in my employment since December.
California

Last edited by Ambro lou; 02-19-2016 at 05:12 PM.. Reason: Added state
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2016, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,409 posts, read 55,579,484 times
Reputation: 22815
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambro lou View Post
I have been collecting unemployment since December but filled my original claim last February so I re applied like I was instructed to do. I have a phone interview on 3/09/2016 "There is a question about your eligibility". Is this going to place my payments on hold until after the interview? My next certification is this Sunday. Also what's there to question nothing has changed in my employment since December.
California
You should be paid through your benefit year-end, but not thereafter until the interview is held. California needs to reinvestigate your status for the new claim - regardless of what you told them in December when you reopened the existing claim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:52 AM
 
1 posts, read 259 times
Reputation: 10
Hey can I still apply for unemployment even though I haven't worked since 2010
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2016, 08:53 AM
 
14,504 posts, read 30,472,489 times
Reputation: 2562
Yes, but you probably won't get anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 05:31 PM
 
2 posts, read 601 times
Reputation: 10
Hello there, my apologies for chiming in here, but I'm dealing with a similar situation.

I opened an unemployment claim-- in CA, so if there's a sub-forum for questions re: unemployment specifically in that state, please feel free to let me know-- last December, to try to recoup some earnings for the 2 unpaid weeks my company had off for the Christmas holiday. Well in mid-February of the following year, our department was outsourced and we were all laid off (pretty sure I submitted a new claim at that point, but am not entirely sure).

In any event, although I have worked various short-term jobs since then (I'm an entertainment freelancer, so a lot of jobs can be short-term/a few months long anyway), will note my earnings from those jobs on my bi-weekly unemployment claims, and have been earning some consistent independent contractor/untaxed 1099 work lately, my claim is getting ready to expire this week... so I don't know if unemployment will continue to send me forms or what (basically my unemployment earnings are kind of a safeguard if I'm unable to find independent contractor work).

And since I have worked several jobs since then-- some W2, some 1099-- even if I did have to refile/create another unemployment claim, I just don't know WHICH job I would have to list.

Unfortunately, EDD's website isn't giving me the option to send in questions, and it's nearly impossible to reach anyone on the phone.

Anyone dealt with having a claim expire, and have insight into what I need to do about creating a new one?? Thanks!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 05:47 PM
 
14,504 posts, read 30,472,489 times
Reputation: 2562
WHAT date does your claim expire? To get a new claim in CA, you file three days before that date (spares you from having a new waiting week). NO! EDD won't just keep paying you unless you refile. Use the web application like you probably did the first time.

UI is always about the LAST job you had, and occasionally the second to last job, but EDD will ask you if they care about your second to last job so don't worry about it.

Depending on the job you lost in February, you probably have unused wages from July 1 to Dec 31, 2015 that will set you up for a decent claim when mixed with the sporadic earnings you've had since February.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2016, 07:29 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,409 posts, read 55,579,484 times
Reputation: 22815
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeyserJose View Post
And since I have worked several jobs since then-- some W2, some 1099-- even if I did have to refile/create another unemployment claim, I just don't know WHICH job I would have to list.

Anyone dealt with having a claim expire, and have insight into what I need to do about creating a new one?? Thanks!!
You apply for a new claim as Chyvan has said. Don't worry about listing all your employers. CA will or will not grant a new claim depending on the amount of new W-2 wages appearing in its database. You list the W-2 employers you can remember. CA probably has better records than you on this. Also, try to find all your W-2 paystubs - you may need them for proof of earnings between last December and now.

If you have earned since last December on W-2 either (1) $1,300 in one quarter, or (2) $900 in one quarter and another $225 outside that quarter, you are eligible for a new claim, which will utilize LAG (unused earnings) from the first claim as well as the new W-2 earnings appearing in the base period. The 1099 earnings do not count towards the above earnings requirements as they are not considered bona fide - unless you get them reclassified.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Work and Employment > Unemployment

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top