Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They were strapped into their seats by their seatbelts. There are multiple pieces of evidence, at this point, that the plane broke up. The only thing is, they really never knew definitively where the plane crashed. It's a huge ocean, there were two arcs the satellite "pings" indicated were possible. That covers a huge surface of the earth. It's not even conclusively known whether the plane followed the ocean arc, or the land arc that skirted the Himalayas and postulated a possible landing around Xinjiang, Kyrgyzstan or Kazakhstan. Though a flaming plane was reported to have been seen flying over the Maldives.
Anyway, even if you eliminate the land route, the ocean area were they could have crashed was so vast, it would have been hard to find them, if they weren't anywhere near shipping lanes.
I believe the bits of evidence of a breakup posted earlier.
And where are these"multiple pieces of evidence"?
Surely you don't believe that one piece that washed up on some deserted island actually came from that aircraft do you?
It is easy to poke holes in your post above.
What other evidence do you offer?
As for witnesses seeing a plane on fire, that story has already been proven not to be so.
Re-read your post which I quoted, and are responding too.
It is full of, no definite answers(well the plane could be here, oh no, over there)
Numerous parts found.(prove it)
The arcs you speak of may have indeed come from the plane, just as it was being drawn into the spacecraft.
Just how long were these arcs being detected?
How do you explain the people tracking this plane stated that just before contact was lost, the jet was observed on radar, going in a zig zag pattern, at speed faster that the jet was capable of, then all contact was lost.
I will stand by what I "saw".
Who is going to pay $70 million for finding the plane?
Exactly. Do they think that the Malaysian PM Najib Razak will follow through with payment? He is the kingpin of the largest embezzlement scheme ever in the history of the world.
And I suppose there are many who believe the Malaysian government wouldn't manufacture a phony piece of evidence.
Any one searching for this aircraft on land or sea, is wasting their time, it isn't there.
In one post, someone stated the passengers were strapped into their seats.
Assuming that was so, they would have quickly been "unfastened", if a jet traveling at 600 knots(as this one was) hit the water.
Assuming another fallacy, if the aircraft survived impact and sunk to the ocean floor, which it wouldn't have because the pressure at that depth would have torn the craft apart, and then sea animals would have devoured the bodies, then remains being lighter, would have floated to the surface.
No remains have ever been found.
I'm not saying I am right, but the evidence seems to point that way.
It might be more feasible an event happened involving a crash, had I not had an instant "view" of what most likely happened to this craft.
If minutes, or even hours passed, and I started to think maybe it didn't crash, perhaps it was abducted.
These would be after thoughts after the fact,
What I saw was instantaneous within seconds of hearing of the incident, and as I stated in other post, and threads, I , for some unseen reason, have this ability to "see" things that others don't, and more often that not, my vision has been correct.
Unlike people who claim to see things in the future, I don't, I only have a vision once hearing of some kind of event.
I realise how those of us who 'see' things which others do not, are convinced they are correct(Bob), but the folks who do not are the ones who dont have that knowing in their life. Without that, they dont understand.
Throughtout history, there have always been people who can 'see' the future or 'see' things. Access to another dimension or to other sources of knowledge is limited in our current society to a few.
However, it depends on a stream of communication and the interpretation of that stream which is not always as it appears to be. Now, you (Bob) might be able to do that interpretation well, but others who also get their own stream of knowledge may not be so good at it. This means we have to be aware that any knowledge received in this way might not be as it is claimed.
Being one of those people who has access to a stream of knowledge like this, surely you understand that, so do not take some disbelief as a personal thing we all have our beliefs.
Having said all of that, there are a few other threads on MH370 on CD, and there are some REALLY good ones on other forums too. I have posted a couple of links below.
There was a LOT of foot-dragging by the authorities when asked for details of this flight as can be seen by the varius threads at the time. People were asking a lot of questions and the authorities did not want to supply the answers - so conspiracy theories abounded. Make of that what you wiill.
The pilots forum is probably the best and most informed one as they are fairly down-to-earth folk and dont succumb to conspiracies much. The calculations were checked and the flight details were posted with maps of the areas. The page 201 I linked to has a map of the search area.
Last edited by ocpaul20; 02-26-2018 at 08:46 PM..
Reason: add url
There are plenty of photos and reports detailing verified wreckage debris to anyone who can use a computer. Let's see some proof of a giant UFO swallowing an airliner.
$70 million is enough motivation to really look for it. Start near Diego Garcia where it was last seen flying towards and where the pilot researched landing the plane. Debris found also points to that location. If they find it there they should stick the cost to the cretins who refused to look for where it was sighted and instead wasted time and money looking a thousand miles to the east.
There are plenty of photos and reports detailing verified wreckage debris to anyone who can use a computer. Let's see some proof of a giant UFO swallowing an airliner.
Oh, now you expect me to look for this so called evidence.
You are the one who said there is plenty of it.
Show it , don't talk about it.
Bob.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.