The Wandjina tribe in Australia (sky-beings) (aliens, ancient)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I was reading about this today and found it very interesting, especially how much these 'sky-beings' look to what many people claim are 'gray aliens'. The tribe refers to them as the 'sky beings' and claim they are responsible for creating people and the planet. They are at least 17K yrs old, some say they may be up to 100K yr old.
I don't know if it's hard evidence, but it's a good article about cave paintings I've not heard about. It seems that a lot of these primitive paintings look very similar regardless of where they are. It's hard to say if that's just from basic human artistic ability or if they actually saw something they're trying to reproduce.
I don't know if it's hard evidence, but it's a good article about cave paintings I've not heard about. It seems that a lot of these primitive paintings look very similar regardless of where they are. It's hard to say if that's just from basic human artistic ability or if they actually saw something they're trying to reproduce.
When our children first start to draw they draw humans with round faces and sticks holding the round faces and round bodies together. One could say that they are primitive artist. Ancient artist simply took the same easy way to draw humans with round faces and round eyes. It wasn't until the 16th and 17th centuries until artist first started painting caricatures. It was a learning process for humans.
Then we had folklore that could have created stories based on the cave pictures. It could have been the old chicken and egg argument.
To say that extraterrestrials have been here for thousands of years is stretching a little too far. I mean they would have needed supplies and there would have been interactions between them and us. Their DNA would have shown up if they mated with us.
When our children first start to draw they draw humans with round faces and sticks holding the round faces and round bodies together. One could say that they are primitive artist. Ancient artist simply took the same easy way to draw humans with round faces and round eyes. It wasn't until the 16th and 17th centuries until artist first started painting caricatures. It was a learning process for humans.
Then we had folklore that could have created stories based on the cave pictures. It could have been the old chicken and egg argument.
To say that extraterrestrials have been here for thousands of years is stretching a little too far. I mean they would have needed supplies and there would have been interactions between them and us. Their DNA would have shown up if they mated with us.
I have large sequences on some of my chromosomes per DNA analysis that are 'unable to be genotyped'. I thought everybody did?
When our children first start to draw they draw humans with round faces and sticks holding the round faces and round bodies together. One could say that they are primitive artist. Ancient artist simply took the same easy way to draw humans with round faces and round eyes. It wasn't until the 16th and 17th centuries until artist first started painting caricatures. It was a learning process for humans.
Then we had folklore that could have created stories based on the cave pictures. It could have been the old chicken and egg argument.
To say that extraterrestrials have been here for thousands of years is stretching a little too far. I mean they would have needed supplies and there would have been interactions between them and us. Their DNA would have shown up if they mated with us.
They drew regular humans too, these beings were much different looking...plus the fact they say they came down from the sky!! So thats pretty significant!
When our children first start to draw they draw humans with round faces and sticks holding the round faces and round bodies together. One could say that they are primitive artist. Ancient artist simply took the same easy way to draw humans with round faces and round eyes. It wasn't until the 16th and 17th centuries until artist first started painting caricatures. It was a learning process for humans.
Then we had folklore that could have created stories based on the cave pictures. It could have been the old chicken and egg argument.
To say that extraterrestrials have been here for thousands of years is stretching a little too far. I mean they would have needed supplies and there would have been interactions between them and us. Their DNA would have shown up if they mated with us.
Unless they are not extraterrestrial...and they are Innerterrestrial or ultraterrestrial?
Unless they are not extraterrestrial...and they are Innerterrestrial or ultraterrestrial?
There is always an "unless". It's like talking about BF, if you cannot prove it; you point out another possibility. There can never be a 'natural' reason why people draw some pictures or saw a creature/UFO. In some of the articles you have posted it was stated that a high percentage of UFOs can be explained; somewhere are 95%. So why not speculate that the few cases left are not simply things that have not been identified as of today? Maybe tomorrow we will?
Perhaps you can bring up some pictures of the humans they drew because the only pictures I have found do not look too much like humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australian_art. While there were attempts to capture 'pictures' of the human likeness in ancient times; it still took many centuries until painting caricatures became an art.
There is always an "unless". It's like talking about BF, if you cannot prove it; you point out another possibility. There can never be a 'natural' reason why people draw some pictures or saw a creature/UFO. In some of the articles you have posted it was stated that a high percentage of UFOs can be explained; somewhere are 95%. So why not speculate that the few cases left are not simply things that have not been identified as of today? Maybe tomorrow we will?
Perhaps you can bring up some pictures of the humans they drew because the only pictures I have found do not look too much like humans: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australian_art. While there were attempts to capture 'pictures' of the human likeness in ancient times; it still took many centuries until painting caricatures became an art.
You are right about some cave paintings, the tribes are no longer around, so we are just guessing at what the art work means, but in the case of the Australian ones, that tribe is still around and its members are very familiar with their history, and their ancestors knowledge.
You are right about some cave paintings, the tribes are no longer around, so we are just guessing at what the art work means, but in the case of the Australian ones, that tribe is still around and its members are very familiar with their history, and their ancestors knowledge.
And it is word of mouth history. It was passed down from one tribe member to another. Did every single tribe member get the story 100% right? I have told you over and over again about my one High School experience and how we could not get the information right even when we wrote it down immediately after it happened. Even if every tribe member had a photographic memory; I would still bet that some would get it wrong.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
