Bigfoot stuff?

[Transmition]

Originally Posted by Versatile

Tree weavers?

Bigfoot Sightings

I think that is hedge trees

Looks like a fairly ordinary camp shelter. Boy scouts often have to build them as part of survival training, retains quite a bit of body heat on a cold night.

[KemBro71]

Originally Posted by Versatile

I am not holding you off. I will get to it. Sorry, but I missed your asking. I have posted them before about 2-3 times before in the past.. I was using TINYPICS but I read they are gone.

Looking forward to these pictures!

[fisheye]

Originally Posted by Versatile

Seems that everyone glosses over as to what benefit has anyone gleaned other than a few exposed hoaxers.

UpstateJohn isn't being paid to do this. Nor are the thousands of others.
The believers are paid nothing.

This is not a question of simply believing in Big Foot. It is more a question of buying the whole package; twisted trees, stuck limbs, smell, or whatever. Not all roads lead to Rome or BRFO! Nature is pretty good at doing some of this stuff without any mythical creature helping her.

Without evidence; how are we to determine which one is a hoax and which one is not?

[Versatile]

Originally Posted by KemBro71

Looking forward to these pictures!

I am old I ache, I have to type with one hand know and I am retired. I just haven't found the correct thumb drive and then I have to set up an account with IMG. Learn their program and then upload them.

The very quick way is to go back on this forum to where I joined in Sept 2006. Start scrolling and you can read all my threads and see the photos. They will be more and better presented.

[Tallysmom]

Originally Posted by Versatile

I am old I ache, I have to type with one hand know and I am retired. I just haven't found the correct thumb drive and then I have to set up an account with IMG. Learn their program and then upload them.

The very quick way is to go back on this forum to where I joined in Sept 2006. Start scrolling and you can read all my threads and see the photos. They will be more and better presented.

If you have talk to text software available, it’s great. You will need to go back and edit before you post, and you will occasionally laugh a lot at what it comes up with, but I use it a lot. And it will learn. But I do almost everything on my phone.

[Versatile]

I will try that. I tried it twice over many years. but it couldn't handle my southern draw. Technology should be tons better than then.

[ocpaul20]

Just as there are some of us on here who definitely believe in Bigfoot, it does not mean we are stupid or gullible as others think. When BF does get photographed up-close and without any blurry doubt we will be vindicated in our belief, but until then we have to wait for the right time.

There are so many things out there that are unexplained and eventually they will be explained for us. However, someone persistently offering explanations when they know really very little about the circumstances, does not help in identification but just puts forward their own and possibly official beliefs.

There is no doubt in my mind that the authorities do not want Bigfoot identified due to the public discussion it would cause. There is a good reason why a large 'dangerous' ape-like being running around national forests and other wild areas would cause much public concern and stop the use of these areas for camping, walking and other outdoor persuits. All that means money lost.

I am absolutely sure we have considered all the normal possibilities our sighting may have been (as any sensible person would do) and obviously we have rejected them for one reason or another.

[hotkarl]

^^^^
Nah. I don’t see what the big deal would be.
I think at this point *if* bigfoot was discovered, the public would handle it quite well.
People get attacked by bears, sharks, and gators all the time and it doesn't stop people from going in the water or the woods.
The reported bigfoot "attacks" are extremely rare. I don't think proof positive would change bigfoots attitude. They would still be illusive and low key.

Sadly, I personally have given up on the existence of this creature. With the science and technology we have today on top of the hordes of bigfoot hunters running around in the woods, we woulda got something concrete by now, especially within the last few years. It's just how it is. At this point, any credible encounters are purely mistaken identity and/or a wild imagination, oh, and hoaxers.

[Versatile]

Once again I say there are good photos and others have shot them.
People have seen the ridicule that anyone gets for reporting or talking about BF.
This is a forum thread about BF and look at the ridicule etc that we get.
Were you to kill one, and report it then there are people that will want to kill you.

[rstevens62]

Originally Posted by Versatile

Once again I say there are good photos and others have shot them.
People have seen the ridicule that anyone gets for reporting or talking about BF.
This is a forum thread about BF and look at the ridicule etc that we get.
Were you to kill one, and report it then there are people that will want to kill you.

Well, there is some reason why 'they' want to keep Bigfoots existence shrouded in mystery, I would assume it has something to do with a conflict with the history we are all taught and maybe some conflicts with organized religions as well.


When I was listening to Vic Cundiffs 'Dogman encounters' podcast, one witness who was in law enforcement mentioned a special ops military division who specifically deals with Bigfoot, Dogman etc, they actually came out to one guys property, said they had gray colored military vehicles, and they wore gray/black military fatigues/ clothing, he also mentioned they had patches with insignia he had never seen before.


Apparently this special ops team had a powerful infrasonic weapon mounted to a truck, and they could point it towards any large wooded area and it would immobilize any bigfoot, dogman in the area.