Is anyone suspicious of the Coronoa Virus 'outbreak'? (government, conspiracy)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
To get this thread back on topic, here's a detailed explanation/timetable of the lab leak --
Thanks for sharing this. An extraordinary account of the origin of COVID-19 and the ensuing coverup, including the possibility that it was genetically "enhanced" in the lab.
Apparently mink have the same problem as ferrets in that they too can catch the virus, so the mink industry has been hit very hard as well.
Why not investigate this nasal spray as many people would prefer something which has been proven to work on animals and by all accounts it is pretty effective and possibly does not contain pieces of placenta, foetus, monkey brain, dead chickens, or other nasty bits and pieces.
Probably a lot cheaper than all this research done by the big pharma companies which would make the vaccine/nasal spray cheaper too. Not so much profit for the investors though...and those investors are quite probably the pension funds of us all.
... something which has been proven to work on animals and by all accounts it is pretty effective and possibly does not contain pieces of placenta, foetus, monkey brain, dead chickens, or other nasty bits and pieces.
MSM deathly silent as PCR test legally ruled useless to test for Covid
Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it
Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.
Earlier this month, Portuguese judges upheld a decision from a lower court that found the forced quarantine of four holidaymakers to be unlawful. The case centred on the reliability (or lack thereof) of Covid-19 PCR tests.
...
Quote:
In the eyes of this court, then, a positive test does not correspond to a Covid case. The two most important reasons for this, said the judges, are that, “the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used’’ and that “the test’s reliability depends on the viral load present.’’ In other words, there are simply too many unknowns surrounding PCR testing.
Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct
Also this Johns Hopkins Study on US deaths mysteriously disappears Source
Quote:
The Gateway Pundit reported back in August that according to the CDC only 6% of all deaths labeled as COVID deaths are solely related to the virus. The remaining deaths have on average at least 2 – 3 comorbidities present.
All that shows is that lawyers and judges are not virologists.
The tests may be set to too great a sensitivity and pick up people who will not get sick or transmit the virus, but they have still been infected. Decreasing the sensitivity may produce false negatives, with failure to isolate someone who will transmit the virus to others.
Which would you rather do: quarantine someone who did not need to be, basically inconveniencing him for two weeks, or fail to quarantine someone who becomes symptomatic and happens to be a super spreader?
Quote:
Also this Johns Hopkins Study on US deaths mysteriously disappears
There was no "Johns Hopkins study". Genevieve Briand has not a clue about COVID-19 deaths. She is wrong. The article was her opinion, not a study. It was published in a student newspaper, not a medical journal, and the newspaper retracted it.
The article has not disappeared at all. Explanation here:
"We decided on Nov. 26 to retract this article to stop the spread of misinformation, as we explained on social media. However, it is our responsibility as journalists to provide a historical record. We have chosen to take down the article from our website, but it is available here* as a PDF.
In accordance with our standards for transparency, we are sharing with our readers how we came to this decision. The News-Letter is an editorially and financially independent, student-run publication. Our articles and content are not endorsed by the University or the School of Medicine, and our decision to retract this article was made independently."
The Gateway Pundit is also wrong. The CDC data showed that of COVID-19 deaths up to the date of the analysis about 6% had no pre-existing conditions. All of the people in the study died from COVID-19. What was shown is that having no health issues will not 100% protect you from dying from COVID-19, but it lowers the risk.
Why are there not runs on the banks right now? Maybe thats because everyone is under the impression the economy is going to be able to come back from this?
I withdrew everything my account this morning, except for the $5. required to hold the account open.
Revisiting an old post - curious how that worked for you with withdrawing everything from your account? Obviously your doom and gloom predictions didn't hold. Should have invested it in stocks.
I dont think it is designed to kill off the stock market - yet. It is designed to increase control of the population.
Soon we will all need a Global Passport to travel anywhere internationally and maybe even to travel anywhere domestically.
This Global Passport will be issued when you have had your vaccinations and when you test negative for the virus. There will be an app which scans a QR code at each site to allow the app to register you there and to allow you inside when the app has determined you are clear of the virus. It seeks to know where there are 'hot spots' of virus and who needs to be quarantined .
As you can see, this will identify everyone, and track their movements. You want that?
This is the start of the next Phase of The Plan. If everyone accepts this control measure, then they will move on to more control because now they can track us and can deny access to travel, to anywhere they like.
Before it was a disposable cellphone sim card, now it is a unique identification each time you enter a 'restricted' (monitored) zone. These can be banks, hospitals, government buildings, social security buildings, post offices, train stations, airports, insurance companies, and there will be incentives for companies to check us as we enter.
Well, you have to consider though, everyone has cell phones today...not really a need to 'show papers' to travel, they can track us all the same, and probably more effectively!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
