Quote:
Originally Posted by bg7
You've got a habit, in many threads here, of posting endless links which don't actually illuminate the situation-in-fact, followed by the obligatory smilie.
Is it because the reality doesn't meet your normative hopeful ideal.
|
I have pointed out the law in relation to the right to free speech balanced with the laws relating to protection of the individual or religous groups in respect to threatening behaviour or hatred or indeed defamatory comments. The links I used were in relation to Human Rights enshrined in our National Law, with cases such as Anjem Choudarys being an important recent example of the law in relation to free speach.
The Law is what dictates what you can and can not say, especially in relation to threatening behaviour or supporting terrorism or in relation to public order or defamation etc etc.
The Law is the Law of the Land and is not my normative hopeful ideal, personal view or indeed my opinion.
I am sorry that you don't seem to understand this, especially in relation to a thread regarding what can and can not be said.