Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think we've discussed this article before, but really, it's railing against a straw man, or at least a paper tiger. The cities that have come back have not come back due to any "right to the city" or anything like that; those who use that rhetoric are typically the people driven out by the higher costs resulting form a city becoming desirable again (or as in SF/Oakland, people who claim to represent those people).
That spent a lot of words saying "life is complicated." But, it doesn't follow that, because life is complicated and dynamic, local governments shouldn't have long-term plans about how to redevelop with a focus on getting more revenue out of its core.
In the end, the blog post was too broad in its scope. If he wants to discuss the limitations of Richard Florida's perspective, narrow in on that. If he wants to speak on the challenges of rust belt cities, choose one and discuss how its historical and economic context frame its current challenges in detail.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.