Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-15-2019, 07:56 AM
 
1,327 posts, read 2,606,127 times
Reputation: 1565

Advertisements

An underground car park was built during late 1960s early in front of Notre Dame.
They even found some old ruins and opened a museum for it. Crypt | Crypte archéologique de l'île de la Cité - Musée Carnavalet - Histoire de la ville de Paris | Paris.fr
The underground parking is just under it.

(Note the photo is inversed).

https://twitter.com/afparchives/stat...07426632032256
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-09-2019, 11:08 AM
 
839 posts, read 734,925 times
Reputation: 1683
Sydney set for 'profound' shift in spending on mass transit rather than motorways

Quote:
The billions of dollars invested in Sydney's transport will increasingly be spent on mass transit systems over the coming decades rather than motorways, the head of the state's transport agency says.

Following a successful opening of a new metro rail line in Sydney's north-west, Transport for NSW secretary Rodd Staples said a "real shift in the thinking" about transport networks was under way.

"I certainly see the shift over the generations ahead that you will see in metropolitan Sydney more of the investment going into the mass transit than in the motorway network," he told the Transport Australia Conference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 01:48 PM
 
4,361 posts, read 7,074,989 times
Reputation: 5216
Quote:
Originally Posted by samiwas1 View Post
Comparing this to making the entire ITP car-free is a pretty large stretch. According to the article, the "city that banned cars" closed off about 300,000 square meters, or about 0.11 square miles. That's about a quarter mile square.
Um, no, Einstein..... 0.11 square miles is 1/9 of a square mile --- not even close to 1/4.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 01:49 PM
 
4,361 posts, read 7,074,989 times
Reputation: 5216
Zermatt, Switzerland, is completely car-free..... As is central Rome, Italy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2019, 09:49 AM
46H
 
1,652 posts, read 1,400,642 times
Reputation: 3625
Quote:
Originally Posted by slowlane3 View Post
Zermatt, Switzerland, is completely car-free..... As is central Rome, Italy.
I was just in Rome last week. It is not car free. There is still a ton of private car and scooter traffic besides cabs and commercial traffic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2019, 04:42 PM
 
4,361 posts, read 7,074,989 times
Reputation: 5216
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46H View Post
I was just in Rome last week. It is not car free. There is still a ton of private car and scooter traffic besides cabs and commercial traffic.
Well, the oldest, historic part of the city is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-28-2019, 04:03 PM
 
839 posts, read 734,925 times
Reputation: 1683
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2019, 09:46 PM
 
839 posts, read 734,925 times
Reputation: 1683
NBC News: Public policy worships the automobile -- and we pay the price
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2019, 07:12 PM
 
3,438 posts, read 4,454,403 times
Reputation: 3683
More irrational logic.

Among the arguments:

1. zoning: complains of "car dependency" due to "illegality" of apartment complexes and requirement for parking. "Dependency" of course is used in a pejorative fashion with respect to cars. However, "transit dependency" is far worse. What if there isn't even any transit around?

2. car design: "every individual has an incentive to buy a tank to protect himself"
Maybe but insurance and cost are barriers. The wide variety of cars in the market shows that not everyone buys a tank. The argument also was that cars weren't designed to protect pedestrians. Of course the narration is making up problems without proposing solutions. He proposes no change to design for pedestrians. Also based on the narrator's logic the same incentive should cause pedestrians to buy cars to solve the "problem". In short, "F" for logic.

3. tax law: complains tax law that makes the government "pay you" for commuter parking and then complains it doesn't pay for bicycling, walking, or going "car free" there is "no incentive". Another really LAME argument. To the extent there is an incentive, those who bicycle, walk, and go "car free" have more money to put into their pockets because they aren't paying for car. The US tax law allows a fringe benefit of $265 if the employer is paying for parking but the $265 has to be reported as income to the worker. So it is not tax free. Alternatively the worker can use pre-tax dollars to pay for parking up to $265/month as part of a qualified plan. Big whoop. The bicyclist and walker are not paying for parking so why would they expect any kind of deduction here? Their complaint is If they want the same they can purchase a car, drive it in, and pay for parking. Bicyclists can get up to $240/month from an employer for bicycling but (like parking is treated) it has to be included in income. Where is the "big" disparity?

His solutions were a bit vague: Solution one: invest in "new resources" with no explanation as to what is meant. Solution two: better allocate existing resources - problem is he is talking about "better allocating" other people's property.



Anti-car advocate whining.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-16-2019, 08:16 AM
 
839 posts, read 734,925 times
Reputation: 1683
BBC Future: What happens when a city bans cars from its streets?

Quote:
“Our main objective is to give the streets back to people,'' says Hanna Marcussen, Oslo’s vice mayor for urban development. “It is about how we want to use our streets and what the streets should be for. For us, the street should be where you meet people, eat at outdoor restaurants, where kids play, and where art is exhibited.” To do this, Oslo has closed off certain streets in the centre to cars entirely. They have also removed almost all parking spots and replaced them with cycling lanes, benches and miniature parks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top