Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluefly
Actually, Obama's responsibility is to run our nation's government. Cutting or expanding the workforce to do that is not a requirement.
Economists are also in wide agreement that Obama prevented our economy from tipping into a new depression. Predictions of a slow recovery, no matter what anyone did, were made before he even took office.
You really can't see why people would support a political party that seeks to stabilize and grow the middle class rather than focus on the upper class? Or provide freedom and equality to oppressed populations? Or actually work to protect the environment?
Most of the most educated people in the world tend toward those values. Not sure where your confusion resides.
|
I am confused that so many people can still cling to these boilerplate assumptions about the Democratic Party.
Since January 20, 2009 America has seen that Obama and his party are wildly ineffective at lowering the national debt, decreasing budget deficits and putting Americans back to work.
Democrats are good at blaming all of their problems on the GOP, however.
Talking about stabilizing and growing the middle class isn't good enough. Eventually you have to put away the snake oil and DO the things you talk about. That is leadership.
Freedom for oppressed populations? Isn't that a George W. Bush line?
Protecting the environment? Obama has re-opened oil drilling for some of his biggest donors.
Don't believe the hype that the Democratic Party is noble. They are in it for the money just like the GOP.
This isn't a "slow recovery". Outside of the Beltway this is an economic depression. Obama has a responsibility to shrink the bureaucracy and put people back to work at PRODUCTIVE jobs that INCREASE GDP.