Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-13-2010, 06:32 PM
 
Location: WA
5,641 posts, read 24,951,486 times
Reputation: 6574

Advertisements

Here in Clark County the appraisal on my property was lowered about 17% but the millage rate was raised about 15%, so my taxes went down about 2%.

(BTW, I looked them up online... they have not sent out statements yet).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2010, 07:18 PM
 
Location: We_tside PNW (Columbia Gorge) / CO / SA TX / Thailand
34,705 posts, read 58,031,425 times
Reputation: 46172
2010 - East Clark County (SW WA)
Valuation down 19%
Millage up 17%
Actual taxes down 4%
Wages down 100%

Home is priced FS at 70% of assessment, no interest... (Clark county is out to lunch on assessed valuations, I hope a class action suit results, tho... If I'm still around (trying to sell house) I would have to PAY the settlement through higher taxes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2010, 08:10 PM
 
28,115 posts, read 63,659,938 times
Reputation: 23268
Default Not a happy camper.

Between 2008 and 2010 my assessed value in Thurston County dropped $123,000 and my tax bill dropped $50 .... YES FIFTY DOLLARS!

It seems no matter what happens, the county collects what it wants...

In 2007 my assessed value was almost exactly what I paid earlier in the year... In 2008 my assessed value increased 35% from the year before... I was told Real Estate has appreciated and nothing could be done.

My assessed 2010 value is still 28% higher than my 2007 value...

Washington is a beautiful State... but all I can say is I'm glad I only have one tax bill to pay...

I agree with ST... homes in my area are for sale well below assessed value and not selling...

The Assessor based all the increases on one out of State Buyer that paid a huge price for some land with the idea of sub-dividing... it never happened because of new wet-land buffers... so here we are still paying ridiculous taxes because of one foolish buyer

Since I have some land with my home... maybe I can figure out a way to turn the place into a religious retreat and avoid property tax altogether.... hmmmm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2010, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Lowlands
271 posts, read 1,236,623 times
Reputation: 168
They keep getting the same amount of tax money, yet they complain about being billions short.

All because they assumed the tax income would just keep climbing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 11:13 AM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,370,975 times
Reputation: 2651
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinj View Post
They keep getting the same amount of tax money, yet they complain about being billions short.

All because they assumed the tax income would just keep climbing.
They aren't getting the same amount of tax money. Sales taxes are way down and make up the majority of state income from taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-18-2010, 05:17 PM
 
Location: Lowlands
271 posts, read 1,236,623 times
Reputation: 168
The state uses the word "short", which could mean that last years tax income were X dollars, so they expect this years income to be X+Y%, if the income is only X dollars, the states cries and cries about they are Y% in the hole. When really it was just a pipe dream.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 11:28 AM
 
3,695 posts, read 11,370,975 times
Reputation: 2651
Quote:
Originally Posted by jinj View Post
The state uses the word "short", which could mean that last years tax income were X dollars, so they expect this years income to be X+Y%, if the income is only X dollars, the states cries and cries about they are Y% in the hole. When really it was just a pipe dream.
Sales tax collections are about 2% lower than they were a year ago in actual dollars, not off of the budgeted amounts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-19-2010, 07:15 PM
 
Location: Lowlands
271 posts, read 1,236,623 times
Reputation: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by sean98125 View Post
Sales tax collections are about 2% lower than they were a year ago in actual dollars, not off of the budgeted amounts.
So, its not $2.8 billion lower?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top