Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which climate do you prefer
Amherst, MA 12 52.17%
Eureka, CA 11 47.83%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2011, 08:35 PM
nei nei started this thread nei won $500 in our forum's Most Engaging Poster Contest - Thirteenth Edition (Jan-Feb 2015). 

Over $104,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum and additional contests are planned
 
Location: Western Massachusetts
45,983 posts, read 53,463,557 times
Reputation: 15184

Advertisements

During the depths of winter the mildness of Eureka, CA seems very appealing compared to where I am. Similar latitude, but not cold, and barely any frosts. Looking at the rest of the year, doesn't seem as good. Anyone prefer Eureka?

Here are the stats for Eureka:

EUREKA WSO CITY, CALIFORNIA - Climate Summary

and for Amherst, MA which is very close to me:

AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS - Climate Summary

Both have similar sunshine, about 2450 hours
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2011, 08:40 PM
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
1,682 posts, read 3,206,457 times
Reputation: 1224
Eureka is like a year-round southern winter, which isn't that bad for me. My main complaint is that Eureka gets no snow, so this monotony would probably get boring to me like a year-round hot desert climate would.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 08:41 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,697,702 times
Reputation: 5248
I prefer Eureka's temperature stability year round. In the summer, if you really crave heat, you can drive a little ways inland out of the fog belt and get blazing hot temperatures.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 09:00 PM
 
Location: Wellington and North of South
5,069 posts, read 8,597,109 times
Reputation: 2675
Probably Amherst. US sun tables show Eureka averaging 51% annually, which is definitely less than 2450, more like 2200.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,923,558 times
Reputation: 5889
I visited Eureka once in Sept, and leaving an east coast summer I was freezing in Eureka. I met people there from Redding and remember them telling me it was 95 in Redding just over the coast range. I was floored by that cause we have nothing similar in the east. Both places have cool summer nights which I don't like. I guess neither. One the winter is too cold, the other the summer is too cool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 09:43 PM
 
Location: New York City
2,745 posts, read 6,462,811 times
Reputation: 1890
Quote:
Originally Posted by nei View Post
During the depths of winter the mildness of Eureka, CA seems very appealing compared to where I am. Similar latitude, but not cold, and barely any frosts. Looking at the rest of the year, doesn't seem as good. Anyone prefer Eureka?

Here are the stats for Eureka:

EUREKA WSO CITY, CALIFORNIA - Climate Summary

and for Amherst, MA which is very close to me:

AMHERST, MASSACHUSETTS - Climate Summary

Both have similar sunshine, about 2450 hours
OT - how do you navigate to MA? When I go to homepage it displays western half of the US only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 10:22 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,043,908 times
Reputation: 11862
It's a toss up, you don't get a cold winter but you have to sacrifice summer for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2011, 11:12 PM
 
Location: motueka nz
497 posts, read 1,087,842 times
Reputation: 233
Amherst. I would just have to get used to cold winters I guess, but summers are way nicer. Eureka is a real "Groundhog Day" climate temp wise. The max temps would be like been permanently stuck in the colder half of the year here. I almost become a Eurekaen/Eurekanite (?) at one stage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2011, 05:44 AM
 
Location: Surrey, London commuter belt
578 posts, read 1,188,492 times
Reputation: 291
Eureka has nice winters but their summer is awful; like October in London. Amherst has nice summers but winters are awful...tough call.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2011, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Iowa
14,321 posts, read 14,615,637 times
Reputation: 13763
Easy for me, I am an east of the Mississippi gal! The river, that is!

The weather in Mass. would suit me very well! Eureka has little variance and very borning! I need that wide swing of temps!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top