Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, we've got one for Africa, so i've decided to do one for Europe.
What do you think would happen?
I myself, do not think that the Gulf stream would have much of an effect on our climate at all,
If Europe was placed North, Ireland and the rest of the British isles would be parallel to Greenland and southern europe would block the gulf stream from reaching us.
Me - 75North.
Southernmost part of Europe- 57North.
Northernmost part of Europe- 89North (it would be south of the pole).
Anywho NW Europe would still be oceanic - it would be like Iceland YUCKY!!
Places like Poland, Norway, Great Britain, Finland would be Taiga bordering on to a Tundra. A Subarctic oceanic climate would preveil. Snow would be plentiful.
Southwestern Europe would be Oceanic like current day NW Europe.
So say bye bye to benidorm.
Also the increase inbetween Africa and Europe would make places like Athens would become very Oceanic also.
At 67N and without Africa just to the south, snowfall would be very high thanks to the North Atlantic current. Probably something similar to Mount Washington, NH although with colder winters and shorter summers.
This made me LOL. How could anyplace be north of the [north] pole?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.