Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I caught an Error with NWS Boston. I’m kinda pissed at their response.
In short.. February 2013 mean temp for BDL (Windsor Locks, CT) was 29.2°. As seen on their F6 data here. National Weather Service Climate
They list it as -.5° below normal. But when you look at the 1981-2010 normal February temp, its actually 30.7°, NOT the 29.7° they claim, which would mean February was -1.5° below normal. A full degree difference!
I contacted NWS Boston for their error showing this, And here’s their response: “For monthly climate normals, it is not a process of averaging monthly temperatures over a 30 year period”
Seriously??
So I took a step further and looked at every month from their F6 Data for BDL in 2012 and WHALLAH. They all pretty much MATCH the 30yr normal but meanwhile they are making an excuse for the below normal month of February???
They used 29.7 February 2012 so instead of it being 6 degrees above normal, it should have been 5 degrees above normal. That 1 degrees is HUGE when you start blending all data together ESPECIALLY if other stations are doing this too. No wonder why 2012 was warmest ever!!
The 30 yr normal is 1981-2010, thats should change. Its not house rules!
And HOLY CRAP.
I just looked at February 2011, they are using 28.8. . Why are they lowering it?? Feb 2011 Instead of -2.2 below normal they show, it should be -4.1 degrees below normal. WOW!~!!
Here's a screenshot just in case anything "changes" with them.
Prior to 1983 they used the image PDF version. But anyone can add February 1981-2010 and divide by 30 and realize they are lieing. Man I hope this is just an error. But an error that hasnt been fixed since 2010.?
Stop. Did you check the WRCC link I keep posting. Those are the numbers used to calculate the 1981-2010 mean, the WRCC site which I keep linking to is where they come from. The WRCC site averages to 29.7°F if you do the math, the numbers come directly from the station. Average these:
They're not making up numbers. Your NCDC values are different from ones I'm posting in three ways:
1) The NCDC rounds to only one decimal place while the WRCC rounds to two.
2) A couple years are about 0.1°F different
3) 1993 in the NCDC record is 54.3°F. In the WRCC, 23.80°F.
BINGO!!! You may have found the error with NCDC!! I will contact them.
They have 54.3 for 1993!
But now... you didnt answer why The NWS used 28.8 as the normal for February 2011. Even if its 29.7 the depature is still wrong... Why are they dropping the normal?
But now... you didnt answer why The NWS used 28.8 as the normal for February 2011. Even if its 29.7 the depature is still wrong... Why are they dropping the normal?
Because they were still using the 1971-2000 normals. Check the WRCC for the normals:
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.