Quote:
Originally Posted by reneeh63
Good question - to me, changeable is a good proxy for unpredictable....what would be another way to objectively measure it?
|
Well the article was referring to predictable in the climatology sense: given a time of year what is the weather likely going to be based on the records from previous years. Essentially this is an exercise in statistics; in this sense then changeable is indeed a good proxy for unpredictable. Areas in the upper midwest, such as Chicago, are changeable (and unpredictable) by this measure whilst Phoenix is less changeable (and more predictable).
However, predictable can also mean how easy is it to generate an accurate forecast for the near future. That is, for a given location and set of initial conditions, how well can the weather be predicted in the next 24, 48, 72 hours or beyond. In this day and age Chicago is quite predictable in this sense--even if the weather is changeable. When was the last time a winter storm hit Chicago with no notice?
I speculate that places in the mountain west, such as Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana, would be rather unpredictable in this sense. This is because the effects of local topography are hard to account for in a forecast model.