Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-23-2019, 11:34 PM
 
195 posts, read 195,793 times
Reputation: 212

Advertisements

I've often wondered this. Obviously any major city could have a natural disaster, but I wonder if someone wanted to avoid them all together what city should they chose? Natural disasters would include, Hurricanes, Tornado's, Floods, Blizzards, Ice Storms, Earthquakes Dust Storms etc. I think I have a short list of cities that should be considered in no particular order
1. Albuquerque NM
2. Atlanta GA
3. Nashville TN
4. Charlotte NC
5. Cincinnati OH
5. Austin/San Antonio TX
7. Boise ID.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2019, 12:37 AM
 
Location: New Jersey and hating it
12,199 posts, read 7,232,697 times
Reputation: 17473
Eliminate Nashville from your list because of the New Madrid fault line. Boise is vulnerable to volcanoes. Atlanta and Charlotte both vulnerable to ice storms and floodings from hurricane aftermaths / remnants. Cincinnati is right on the Ohio river so there is potential for flooding there. I guess the only one standing on your list is ALB.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 01:51 AM
 
Location: Bellingham, WA
465 posts, read 405,623 times
Reputation: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Boise is vulnerable to volcanoes.
Are you talking about Yellowstone? Because the risk from that on a year-to-year basis is extremely low; it hasn't erupted for over half a million years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 02:49 AM
 
Location: Tricity, PL
61,751 posts, read 87,217,162 times
Reputation: 131751
I think Denver, Chicago, Buffalo, Cleveland, Seattle are pretty safe.. They might have occasional floods/snow storms, but they also have pretty good plans how to deal with it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 04:02 AM
 
30,455 posts, read 21,298,747 times
Reputation: 12005
Tampa...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 05:07 AM
 
Location: Brighton/London
376 posts, read 241,034 times
Reputation: 194
san diego
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 07:43 AM
 
4,401 posts, read 4,300,828 times
Reputation: 3907
Quote:
Originally Posted by antinimby View Post
Eliminate Nashville from your list because of the New Madrid fault line. Boise is vulnerable to volcanoes. Atlanta and Charlotte both vulnerable to ice storms and floodings from hurricane aftermaths / remnants. Cincinnati is right on the Ohio river so there is potential for flooding there. I guess the only one standing on your list is ALB.
While ABQ usually wins this discussion. Nashville doesn't have an abnormally high earthquake risk. Not as much so as Memphis at least. What is this volcano risk for Boise you speak of? If it's Yellow Stone....Well if that thing blows we're all dead. Atlanta and Charlotte can get ice storms, but generally they aren't that severe.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 07:44 AM
 
4,401 posts, read 4,300,828 times
Reputation: 3907
Quote:
Originally Posted by elnina View Post
I think Denver, Chicago, Buffalo, Cleveland, Seattle are pretty safe.. They might have occasional floods/snow storms, but they also have pretty good plans how to deal with it...
Seattle has a pretty serious earthquake threat, and the rest of those cities are pretty prone to blizzards. While blizzards are by mo means the worst natural disaster, it was under OP's criteria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 08:09 AM
 
6,825 posts, read 10,528,599 times
Reputation: 8392
There are 'recently' active volcanoes in New Mexico, too - as in the past 5000-10000 years - just fyi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2019, 08:18 AM
 
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
10,930 posts, read 11,732,494 times
Reputation: 13170
Flint, Michigan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top