Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Massachusetts had a euthanasia vote and I voted no. Liable for abuse and not a decision that can be undone [yes, I'm also opposed to capital punishment]. Measure narrowly failed. Catholic Church made an effort to convince people to vote against; they still have some influence left.
For lommaren: more educated liberal areas tended to vote in favor; more working-class & non-white areas opposed.
I think I remember reading that with this case the treatment would have only helped prolong his life a bit further in the small chance it actually worked - the baby would still be living in pain and unable to function as a proper human being. I think that it would only prolong suffering but I get your point
the cure may have a small chance for it to work, there's little to lose. The baby can't make decisions; the hospital decided its in the best interest of the baby to die.
Exactly my thoughts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.