Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think the political compass quiz is much more complete than this one in regard to it's ability to pinpoint your political beliefs. I, for example, do believe in a certain measure of ecological and environmental regulation which is something many Liberatariaon Conservatives would not support.
I think the political compass quiz is much more complete than this one in regard to it's ability to pinpoint your political beliefs. I, for example, do believe in a certain measure of ecological and environmental regulation which is something many Liberatariaon Conservatives would not support.
The political compass asks questions like "you cannot be truly moral without being religious", and that doesn't relate to European politics at all.
I think the political compass quiz is much more complete than this one in regard to it's ability to pinpoint your political beliefs. I, for example, do believe in a certain measure of ecological and environmental regulation which is something many Liberatariaon Conservatives would not support.
Seems as if a single issue can greatly sway the results of these quizzes in one direction or another.
I consider myself a centrist and would probably be considered a socialist in the US, but I do support some US laws that would probably be considered harsh on here, such as the use of deadly force to protect lives and property from burglars/thieves.
No. The USA is a country (arguably an empire), but it's not a nation. Even if it were a nation, I'm not really a part of it. Therefore, "nationalism" or "fascism" in an American context has no significance or appeal to me.
I consider myself a centrist and would probably be considered a socialist in the US, but I do support some US laws that would probably be considered harsh on here, such as the use of deadly force to protect lives and property from burglars/thieves.
I only support deadly force in situations where a person's life is in danger and it comes down to a 'you or them' scenario. It's unlikely that a person would be prosecuted for killing someone if they genuinely believed their life was under threat.
I wouldn't support killing someone to protect material possessions, if the intruder is unarmed (if they are armed you could reasonably argue that you thought your life was in danger). I would support a citizens arrest though - and I was reading a story recently of how this man in Leeds chased down a burglar who broke into a neighbouring house and caught him until the police arrived. Apparently this is perfectly fine.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
