Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-10-2016, 09:26 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,924,830 times
Reputation: 5895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
That's absolutely awful

Curious George, think Bastardi will mention this latest run? I'm sure he will trash it. He has a recent post that is praising the CFS cause they show cold in winter. At least admit the guy cherry picks and just cannot bring himself to even predict a mild winter. After every winter, so as to seem less biased, he calls for a string of mild winters in the East, and then like clockwork come August he starts harping on the cold analogs. Right now, he is talking about another 2014 type January. Guy is just so biased and tries to act like he isn't. Why isn't he mentioning the expanding pool of cold water off the PNW coastline?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-10-2016, 09:58 AM
 
29,520 posts, read 19,612,482 times
Reputation: 4539
He trashes the models when they don't make sense to him. What, you don't think he was calling for a US torch last winter? Come on His clients are on the energy sector. He isn't doing this for fun or wish casting. He needs to be accurate for his clients who trade energy commodities.

And no that model run doesn't make sense to me either given the CURRENT SST's. Of course that model may be seeing a change in ocean anomalies that we can't see.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-10-2016, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Near the Coast SWCT
83,513 posts, read 75,277,900 times
Reputation: 16619
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
That's absolutely awful
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom77falcons View Post
Um, so let's see Europe actually gets a cold winter and we don't. Something up with that. That sure looks like a negative NAO, which impacts us as well as them. How can they be cold and Eastern Europe and Russia warm? Their real cold comes from the east. These long range things are just stupid at this point.
Greenland being cold implying NO NEGATIVE NAO. Lack of blocking would be one reason for more warmth


While there are so many factors in play, I haven't had time to dissect, maybe you guys want to..


A Quick look, it looks like Augusts update (on right) shows more La Nina then previous update. Implying a warmer Eastern U.S with a La Nina vs Neutral? Wonder what other factors are different.


JAMSTEC NINO FORECAST


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2016, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Boise, ID
8,046 posts, read 28,472,904 times
Reputation: 9470
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cambium View Post
Since I've been researching, reading, studying about the sun, it's truly fascinating how it gets ignored too much IMO. One reason is because there is a lag time. People hate to think "what could happen" and rather know what will happen in the near term.


Another is maybe because there's not enough studies. Another is because there's so many other factors that it's hard to isolate 1 thing? Whatever the case is, it's interesting to see how the sun DOES play a role in weather and climate. (more so climate I think)


And to see what we are entering is pretty damn interesting if you ask me. One that shouldn't be ignored but again, back to that thing about how can we be so sure?


Just put this together real quick.. Total number of daily sunspots.... 1970s....low. Early 80s was high.





Just look at the "PEAK" of this cycle.. was much lower than NASA forecasted and much lower than previous cycles.


https://twitter.com/ForbesTech/statu...47307254943745
If you are really interested in reading more about this, you should read Phil Plait's Death from the Skies. He is a professional astronomer and is a very entertaining blogger (he runs the Bad Astronomy blog on Slate). He talks about this very topic in his book (sunspots impacting the climate). General conversation is that it is possible that the lack of sunspots in the 1800s contributed to the mini Ice Age, but it is totally inconclusive, and right now all we have for sure is correlation, not necessarily causation.


It is fact that fewer sunspots do mean that the sun is giving off less visible light, and less of other forms of radiation, so it COULD cause a temporarily cooler Earth, but it is only .1% - .5% less light, so may not play any significant role. If it did, then all planets should be correspondingly cooler during sunspot minimums, related to their distance from the sun, and we aren't seeing that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:09 AM
 
29,520 posts, read 19,612,482 times
Reputation: 4539
Possible analog... I'll be happy, Tom will be happy, poor Cambium... first a summer too hot for him, then a mild winter.

https://twitter.com/ClimateNewsCA/st...27499848589312
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:17 AM
 
Location: NoVa
803 posts, read 1,667,837 times
Reputation: 873
^ I know it's just a blend but the map looks kinda weird.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Mid Atlantic USA
12,623 posts, read 13,924,830 times
Reputation: 5895
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
Possible analog... I'll be happy, Tom will be happy, poor Cambium... first a summer too hot for him, then a mild winter.

https://twitter.com/ClimateNewsCA/st...27499848589312

Lol, this is the problem with lumping all those analogs together. Look at some of those years individually instead of lumped together. 1981 thru 1985 were horrendous winters here. They bear no resemblance to the winter of 2015-16.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Lizard Lick, NC
6,344 posts, read 4,406,132 times
Reputation: 1991
Quote:
Originally Posted by chicagogeorge View Post
Possible analog... I'll be happy, Tom will be happy, poor Cambium... first a summer too hot for him, then a mild winter.

https://twitter.com/ClimateNewsCA/st...27499848589312
Basically record warm northeast, record warm south Florida, record warm California, very mild southeast and midatlantic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Norman, OK
2,850 posts, read 1,970,186 times
Reputation: 892
Quote:
Originally Posted by muslim12 View Post
Basically record warm northeast, record warm south Florida, record warm California, very mild southeast and midatlantic.
The dark red area is only 1°F or more above average.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-12-2016, 06:25 PM
 
Location: New York
11,326 posts, read 20,328,314 times
Reputation: 6231
I just want a mild zone 8 winter with minimal snowfall. I know it'll be the polar opposite though, even if it starts out extremely warm like last winter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top