Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the last 4 years Lommaren the figure for laying snow days is
0
before that there used to be odd days here and there ,usually well into the New Year during a cold snap - from memory maybe a 3 day spell in Jan followed by a 2 day spell in Feb or even March .
Seems really alien now .
General daytime winter pattern in January was for a long time
6 - 9C cloudy ,dry (most common by a distance)
4 - 7c sunny (next most common)
7-10 light rain (maybe 20 - 30 hours of rain in a month )
and nights can be really cold -2 / or really mild overnight - more often cold though with guaranteed frosts after clear days
last few winters crazy mild temps - but you also get them now in Stockholm Ha
quite boring really is winter
San Francisco is such a small micro climate though. Just 15 miles outside the city and you are in a whole other climate in terms of sunshine, and summer temps that would blow away anything within hundreds of miles of London...
San Francisco is such a small micro climate though. Just 15 miles outside the city and you are in a whole other climate in terms of sunshine, and summer temps that would blow away anything within hundreds of miles of London...
But as I've said before. This is London vs San Francisco. Not London vs San Francisco and the wider area.
Nah it's not to annoy him, for real I don't want to annoy anyone! I just want to prove Torshavn that London is not as "hated" as he thinks lol, just Europe has lots of worse climates (most of UK, northern France or Belgium, most of Netherlands, most of Denmark, most of Scandinavia, Finland...) without counting that worldwide, the world has loooots of far worse climates than London has.
London at least can grow some few species of palm trees. That's a very positive thing for warm lovers like me. I know that with B87, I hope that this thread won't get that as I made the votes public!
I don't know anyone that hates London. Give the average American a free trip to London say vs somewhere in the US and around 90% would choose London I would think. It is a fantastic city and far cleaner and more interesting than NYC. People shouldn't define a city by its climate. Who really cares that much about climate (unless it will kill you) if the city is a great place to visit and see the sights. You don't have to live in the climate, just visit.
San Francisco is such a small micro climate though. Just 15 miles outside the city and you are in a whole other climate in terms of sunshine, and summer temps that would blow away anything within hundreds of miles of London...
yeah very true ,but i think San Fran was picked in isolation because of it's weird set up
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I know that with B87, I hope that this thread won't get that as I made the votes public!
