Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The oceanicity - continentality gradient is dependent on, among other factors, the distance to the sea, the prevailing winds, and mountains.
Here is a map of Europe and the Middle East that seems fairly accurate wrt to the oceanicity - continentality gradient. For larger map, use link and zoom in.
Here is a closer look at the Nordic countries. O3 (dark blue) = strongly oceanic, O2 = clearly oceanic, O1 = weakly oceanic, OC = intersection oceanic-continental, C1 = weakly continental. On the larger Europe map with smaller resolution, the smaller area of continental climate in the valleys in Central Norway is not marked, but the larger area in the far north of Sweden, Finland, Norway (Finnmark) and a slice of Russia is marked. The map of the Nordic countries is based on humidity and precipitation according to txt.
Some observations:
In Mid-Norway, one can drive from a O3 (strongly oceanic) area (like Kristiansund, Ålesund) to an area with C1 (weakly continental, like Dombås, Drivdal) within some hours (ca 3-4 hours), corresponding to a change in continentality as from Leeds to Moscow. And drive 2hrs from Trondheim to get to C1 areas. I guess other mountain areas also have those valleys much more continental than surrounding areas, like in British Columbia.
Trondheim is O1 - weakly oceanic (about like much of Germany, eastern France, western Poland, southeastern Sweden). Oslo is OC (just barely), like Helsinki.
Ireland, some (but not all) coastal areas of UK, and some thin coastal areas of France, Spain, Portugal and Iceland seems to be the most oceanic in Europe. Eastern part of European Russia is the most continental part of Europe, no surprise there. Eastern Siberia is the most continental in the world.
Look at the Arabian peninsula, much less continental then one migh expect. Maybe that map is mostly based on temperature range?
In North America, a much smaller area is oceanic, as we know the Rocky mts block most of the continent from oceanic influences.
What are your thoughts, are those map accurate?
The fundamental question is perhaps about what defines oceanicity and continentality.
Last edited by Jakobsli; 07-11-2017 at 05:50 PM..
Reason: correction - drive from strongly oceanic
Without going too deeply into specifics, I recall seeing a map with a continentality gradient for America, and by the looks of that map, it appeared continentality begin increasing anywhere west of Indiana and with continentality increasing considerably west of about the Mississippi River; in general, the Great Plains region has probably the highest level of continentality in the conterminous United States.
Hm...Inland Sydney and Santiago are definitely more "continental" than Near Eastern coast (Beirut) and North African coast (Alexandria), which have a slightly lesser annual temp range.
The N America map just looks like a map of average temperature or something. Not sure how accurate that is when Cape Cod is deemed more continental than parts of west Texas
If someone wants to know why Spain is more detailed in that map, is because GlobalBioClimatics is owned by a Spanish geography company. As well as OGIMET or Tutiempo.
I'm in the yellow, would like to be in the yellow-orange, so I'm only one zone off
Also wow at Australia, I would have expected them to have some (relatively small) area in the yellow.
We do.
The map didn't get us right.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.