Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Your climate seems to have very high diurnal temperature ranges and sunny winters which are not really different from summers percentage wise. These are not traits most people would consider typical for an oceanic climates I think. Most oceanic climates have narrow diurnal ranges due to oceanic influence and winters tend to be gloomier than summers on a percentage basis even at equivalent areas to your latitude like Northern Spain it seems to be the case.
Vancouver is in the typical oceanic camp with Mediterranean influences according to the OPs criteria.
Actually due to island heat London fits into the transitional temperate/subtropical category (Tm>10ºC), but its surroundings (the typical England's countryside) do fit into the C3to, because they fulfil the main requeriments of a Temperate climate (C3t), wich are annual mean btw 3ºC and 10ºC and Pp above 250mm. But then i proposed the subdivisions Temperate continental (C3tc) and Temperate oceanic (C3to), both with their respective requeriments (the latter's mentioned in my previous post). And the one among the two sharing more fulfiled requeriments with a given place, is the actual climate of that place.
Well according to the 6 warmest months Vancouver is a cool oceanic climate because only 4 months are at or above 13°C though May is close...
Actually May makes it according to the Vancouver Harbour station and that's where the majority of people live. The airport is isolated with nothing else around it.
Actually May makes it according to the Vancouver Harbour station and that's where the majority of people live. The airport is isolated with nothing else around it.
The airport is really unrepresentative of the GVA. It's a bit disappointing that is kinda considered the typical Vancouver weather when it's a bit different...
Using the definition of distinct in nature, I don't see Vancouver as being distinct from London, while I do see Hobart and my climate as distinct from those two - I'd say very distinct.
Climate is just a minor factor contributing to the distinctiveness of New Zealand's nature; its geologic history and subsequent isolation are bigger factors.
Actually May makes it according to the Vancouver Harbour station and that's where the majority of people live. The airport is isolated with nothing else around it.
Climate is just a minor factor contributing to the distinctiveness of New Zealand's nature; its geologic history and subsequent isolation are bigger factors.
Of course - everywhere is a product of climate, geological history and subsequent isolation/contact.
That's why I see the suitability of exotic species as a better indicator of comparative levels of subtropical-ness.
I didn't think subtropical-ness was the issue today.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
