Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-04-2018, 02:13 PM
 
Location: Buenos Aires and La Plata, ARG
2,946 posts, read 2,914,264 times
Reputation: 2121

Advertisements

It has always struck me. Yeah, and i know that's a thing among the boreal/hemiboreal forests to need less precipitation volume (here Ushuaia is very green and has "only" 530mm a year on like 180 days), but in that area of Canada the standard is specially low, at a point that it almost defies logic.
Banff averages 470mm on 140 days, and Jasper even lower: 390mm on 130 days. By comparison, Aspen, Colorado averages over 630mm and it looks clearly more arid despite its overall greenery, and West Glacier, Montana averages 740mm on 155 days and yet it looks a bit less green than those canadian towns.
Discuss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-04-2018, 03:58 PM
 
895 posts, read 602,946 times
Reputation: 370
Note that I am just making speculations here without being an expert in the subject.

Neither Banff nor Jasper are arid/semi-arid. Banff has 136% the precipitation of Koppen's B threshold and Jasper has 185%.

The type of soil has a major effect on which plants can grow. Soil is probably the third most influential factor after temperatures and precipitation. I don't know specifically what soil those places have, but Banff/Jasper may have a better soil.

Aspen, CO gets more of its precipitation as snow. Snow may sublimate without soaking into the ground.

Aspen's higher elevation may lead to a higher evaporation rate because the water boils at lower temperatures when pressure is lower.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2018, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,011,327 times
Reputation: 34866
Why are Banff and Jasper, AL so green despite their low precipitation?

Because of year round snow and glacier melt. There's plenty enough of slow seeps and run-off water up there as long as the Rocky Mountains ranges get snow each winter. Which they always do, (so far).


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-05-2018, 07:21 PM
 
4,985 posts, read 3,960,626 times
Reputation: 10147
"Why are Banff and Jasper, AL so green..."
photoshop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 02:47 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,727,826 times
Reputation: 17393
Jasper, Alabama?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 09:19 AM
 
Location: Seattle area
9,182 posts, read 12,120,375 times
Reputation: 6405
The abbreviation for Alberta is AB.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 04:27 PM
 
Location: God's Country
5,182 posts, read 5,246,081 times
Reputation: 8689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Craziaskowboi View Post
Jasper, Alabama?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botev1912 View Post
The abbreviation for Alberta is AB.

Yeah, I was gonna say that I didn't realize anywhere in Alabama had low precip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 05:44 PM
 
Location: Buenos Aires and La Plata, ARG
2,946 posts, read 2,914,264 times
Reputation: 2121
Quote:
Originally Posted by Botev1912 View Post
The abbreviation for Alberta is AB.
haha i was trying a metaphor, saying that Banff looks so green, as if it were located in Alabama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoisite View Post
Why are Banff and Jasper, AL so green despite their low precipitation?

Because of year round snow and glacier melt. There's plenty enough of slow seeps and run-off water up there as long as the Rocky Mountains ranges get snow each winter. Which they always do, (so far).


.
I thought of that, too, but Montana and Colorado rockies have a lot of snow too (even more) and they don't look as green. Remember that canadian Rockies aren't as glaciated as the Cascade Range of BC is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 08:08 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,692,113 times
Reputation: 5248
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlaver View Post
haha i was trying a metaphor, saying that Banff looks so green, as if it were located in Alabama



I thought of that, too, but Montana and Colorado rockies have a lot of snow too (even more) and they don't look as green. Remember that canadian Rockies aren't as glaciated as the Cascade Range of BC is.
lower evapotranspiration in Banff/Jasper than further south because its colder and therefore greener.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-06-2018, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Canada
14,735 posts, read 15,011,327 times
Reputation: 34866
Quote:
Originally Posted by marlaver View Post

I thought of that, too, but Montana and Colorado rockies have a lot of snow too (even more) and they don't look as green. Remember that canadian Rockies aren't as glaciated as the Cascade Range of BC is.

Montana and Colorado are still more arid and have less humidity in the air. Did you research and do comparisons of the differences in the species of trees and other vegetation that thrive in the respective locations? They aren't all the same species and don't all have the same needs. Also, as QIDb602 mentioned, there is the differences in PH levels and types of soils and minerals to take into consideration. The southern Rockies tend toward more alkaline soils and more "rugged" vegetation than the northern Rockies which tend toward more acidic and peaty soils and more numerous acid loving vegetation. And some of the solid rock peaks have different stone type and density from each other, some being porous and retaining and releasing more moisture from within the stone while those with less porous rock are less hospitable since the stone holds less moisture. So the numbers and types of plants/trees that grow in the different locations isn't entirely dependent on how much precipitation they get, there's many other things to factor in. Even the colours and shades of the vegetation in the south is different from those in the north.


.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top