Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Climate battle: Which one do you prefer?
Sydney, Australia 11 84.62%
Sfax, Tunisia 2 15.38%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Bidford-on-Avon, England
2,413 posts, read 1,035,532 times
Reputation: 263

Advertisements

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sfax#Climate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sydney#Climate

I vote for Sydney for having cooler summers

 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:30 AM
 
895 posts, read 600,394 times
Reputation: 370
Sydney and it's not close.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:54 AM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,664,068 times
Reputation: 5242
Sfax for being drier, having more sunshine and better summers.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 12:11 PM
 
1,503 posts, read 906,545 times
Reputation: 872
Sydney for warmer winters and slightly cooler summer highs and more rainfall.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 03:40 PM
 
Location: Anglers Reach, NSW (Australia)
388 posts, read 211,841 times
Reputation: 243
Sydney, NSW

Much stormier, perhaps squallier, and much wetter. Summers are also more unstable and fun.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 09:20 PM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,483 posts, read 6,158,912 times
Reputation: 4577
Sydney: 59.4% / E+*
Sfax: 24.3% / F-

Sydney. Sfax is desert garbage.

*Sydney's score calculated to a 60.9% / D-, but climates where it has not snowed within a typical human lifetime (about 75-85 years) are capped to an E rating, the highest of which is a 59.4%. Since Sydney has not seen snow since 1836, this cap applies.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:14 PM
 
Location: Sydney, Australia
11,651 posts, read 12,906,549 times
Reputation: 6369
Sydney, but I wouldn't mind Sfax, although it's too dry for plants/vegetation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wawa1992 View Post
Sydney: 59.4% / E+*
Sfax: 24.3% / F-

Sydney. Sfax is desert garbage.

*Sydney's score calculated to a 60.9% / D-, but climates where it has not snowed within a typical human lifetime (about 75-85 years) are capped to an E rating, the highest of which is a 59.4%. Since Sydney has not seen snow since 1836, this cap applies.
The "snow" in 1836 was said to be graupel, although it was 'recorded' and forecast as snow:



At 3C/38F, it's kinda too warm for snow, no?
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:20 PM
 
Location: Anglers Reach, NSW (Australia)
388 posts, read 211,841 times
Reputation: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Sydney, but I wouldn't mind Sfax, although it's too dry for plants/vegetation.


The "snow" in 1836 was said to be graupel, although it was 'recorded' and forecast as snow:



At 3C/38F, it's kinda too warm for snow, no?
Most certainly not!

It very easily snows at 3° C or even slightly higher round here—especially beneath WSW/SW frontal systems.

The colonial settlers at the time would've certainly been familiar with a fall of snow; snow can fall at most peculiar places at times. Take, for instance, West Wallsend (70 m AMSL; 32° S, near Newcastle) in the winter of 1965.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:28 PM
 
Location: White House, TN
6,483 posts, read 6,158,912 times
Reputation: 4577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
Sydney, but I wouldn't mind Sfax, although it's too dry for plants/vegetation.


The "snow" in 1836 was said to be graupel, although it was 'recorded' and forecast as snow:



At 3C/38F, it's kinda too warm for snow, no?
I've heard of snow at 3C/38F and seen it, but it's typically light and doesn't stick. It's plausible that it snowed at that temperature, but heavy snow is nearly impossible that warm due to the dew point effect - if there's heavy precipitation at 3 C / 38 F, the dew point is probably above freezing, and it would be heavy rain, which I have seen a number of times in that temperature range.

Snow probability calculator | ScienceBits

This calculator shows that at 3 C / 38 F, it's likely (more than 50% chance) to be snow if the humidity is below ~65%. If the humidity is below ~54%, it's pretty much certain to be snow, at ~54-81% humidity, there is a diminishing chance of snow, and at 82%+ humidity it will NOT snow. Since precipitation typically falls at high humidities and precipitation below 65% humidity is fairly rare, it usually rains. Nevertheless, snow is still a possibility.

By the way, at 10 C / 50 F and 1% humidity precipitation would still be snow. But it would never precipitate at 1% humidity.
 
Old 01-16-2019, 11:34 PM
 
Location: Anglers Reach, NSW (Australia)
388 posts, read 211,841 times
Reputation: 243
And as we can plainly see from Syndey's meteorological reports from 1836 (of which Ethereal had posted), the wind direction was chiefly SW; these sort of frontal systems yield rather dry and cold air for anywhere eastwards of the Great Dividing Range, thereby snowfall was quite a certainty for Sydney.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top