Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think Auckland does belong in the same classification as Bergen, because both are oceanic moderated C climates that don't have a clearly defined seasonal break from the influence of Polar fronts.
By that logic, temperate oceanic and subpolar oceanic should just one zone.
It's still moderated by the ocean and dominated by the polar front.
I wouldn't say my Oceanic climate is dominated by the polar front, it just doesn't have a clearly defined seasonal break, they way Med and subtropical climates do.
I wouldn't say my Oceanic climate is dominated by the polar front, it just doesn't have a clearly defined seasonal break, they way Med and subtropical climates do.
Then your climate does not belong in the same zone as Bergen.
Why not? -it's warmest month is the same as here, and it's average summer minimums are even warmer than here.
Both get cold fronts, even in the middle of summer.
Because Bergen has winters in the 'f' range. Winters are above freezing but still cold enough for snow, abeit snow that melts shortly after landing, on a fairly regular basis. Snow in Auckland, however, is almost unheard of.
Same category as Auckland using Koppen or using my system?
Your system, although I'm talking about my town, which is the same classification as Auckland and gets 40 frosts, compared to Auckland's 0 frosts - I don't know if that many frosts would be considered significant to you?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.