Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This climate is based on a Southern California climate, except there is notably more rainfall. There are a few other small changes, but I’d like to hear everyone’s thoughts. I would give it a D. Th higher rainfall is a plus, but temps are still too hot and it is also too sunny.
Winters are warm, bordering on very warm, and almost fully freeze-free. Summers, while hot and not completely dry, aren't as hot as my area and are still very dry. Winters are even less gloomy than mine. The mean annual temperature is HOT rather than just warm like my area (as in it would qualify for BSh or BWh if it were arid). Yet the winters are still just wet enough to stop everything from drying out despite all that.
If I lived in a climate like that, I'd probably grow a massive California Fan Palm in my backyard with a Blue Spruce alongside it and European Fan Palm nearby. Maybe even a Chilean Wine Palm too if I tried coconuts and decided I liked them.
Summers are hot and sunny, but not humid. Winters cool down enough for there to be enough seasonality, but aren’t cold which is great. The additional rainfall in the winter months also helps to add some variability to this climate.
B. LA's biggest downside is the lack of reliable rain so this fixes that (provided the minimum annual rainfall isn't too low)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.