
09-26-2013, 07:59 PM
|
|
|
Location: ADK via WV
5,684 posts, read 8,331,926 times
Reputation: 2234
|
|
|

09-26-2013, 08:22 PM
|
|
|
941 posts, read 1,294,114 times
Reputation: 181
|
|
Now this is a move in the right direction
|

09-27-2013, 06:00 AM
|
|
|
79,865 posts, read 41,930,585 times
Reputation: 17031
|
|
Cool. I always said that if it makes sense someone will step up and do it.
|

09-27-2013, 07:20 AM
|
|
|
Location: ADK via WV
5,684 posts, read 8,331,926 times
Reputation: 2234
|
|
It would be a good use for a lot of strip mine sites. We need as much energy as we can get here in America, so bring on the natural gas, oil, solar, wind, and hydro!
|

09-27-2013, 10:26 AM
|
|
|
1,882 posts, read 1,988,142 times
Reputation: 654
|
|
Agreed Chriscross.
|

09-27-2013, 01:31 PM
|
|
|
46 posts, read 64,861 times
Reputation: 57
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chriscross309
It would be a good use for a lot of strip mine sites. We need as much energy as we can get here in America, so bring on the natural gas, oil, solar, wind, and hydro!
|
Now there's a great idea! Convert the strip mine sites into alternative power sites!
We need to think about the future and coal is not it!! Very good article, hope it works out. 
|

10-09-2013, 03:06 AM
|
|
|
503 posts, read 772,649 times
Reputation: 382
|
|
Meh.....35 megawatts and they are throwing away the very thing that makes WV attractive, it's natural beauty.
They've already destroyed the vistas with those silly windmills and now they want to put these inefficient solar panels in.
Once again, a few landowners will get paid, the money will outflow to some fat cat in another state and the locals will largely get left holding the bag.
Same as it ever was.
|

10-09-2013, 06:47 AM
|
|
|
79,865 posts, read 41,930,585 times
Reputation: 17031
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Bowman
Meh.....35 megawatts and they are throwing away the very thing that makes WV attractive, it's natural beauty.
They've already destroyed the vistas with those silly windmills and now they want to put these inefficient solar panels in.
Once again, a few landowners will get paid, the money will outflow to some fat cat in another state and the locals will largely get left holding the bag.
Same as it ever was.
|
I understand the complaints but..........the oil wells of the past can have the same said of them. The mines of the past most certainly have had the same about them. There is a trade off. Without those things we are still riding horses, seeing a Dr only when he makes his rounds and working from sun up to sun down to survive.
Perhaps that is your idea of good times but technology marches forward. Maybe in the end solar is just a footnote in history books but they are no more obtrusive to the views than oil wells and mines (both of which I do not complain about for the reasons noted).
|

10-09-2013, 07:34 AM
|
|
|
Location: ADK via WV
5,684 posts, read 8,331,926 times
Reputation: 2234
|
|
I was in Vermont this past weekend, and everywhere I looked there were Solar Panels in clusters of about a dozen every few miles. The panels did not take away from the natural beauty, but they enhanced my opinion of Vermont. That was my first extensive stay in the state, and I must say that they have done a good job with green energy alongside their historic and tourist villages and towns. solar Panels can be a positive thing if they are set up right, and not in big numbers.
|

10-09-2013, 08:33 AM
|
|
|
6,347 posts, read 9,517,797 times
Reputation: 1794
|
|
I'm going to agree with pknopp and Chris. This is progress. WV has plenty of beauty and solar panels wont ruin WV.
Sure beats having a coal plant spew out pollution.
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|