Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
An American College Town where 25% of the students are international students is not Multicultural, according to the European definition.
There are some College Towns in the U.S. with a large presence of foreign students, but the only "multicultural" presence (according to the European definition) are local yokels, "disadvantaged minorities", bible belters in the South and rednecks of all sorts.
10.9% of the population of Leeds is not White British, but that's a much lower number than somewhere like London, where does it stand? Multicultural? Or not? Because there's definitely a lot of multicultural diversity here, from Indian to Chinese to Polish.
It was used in the past, during the 70's and 80's. During the emergence of FN.
Spanish borrowed the buzzword from French.
"Diversidad" and "mestizaje" are used here, but are the absolute patrimony of Caviar Leftists, Preppy Socialist and Snooppy lovers.
Spain borrowed the word because at that time we had 0 immigration and no word to describe such a situation.
For example, if the culture of the Pacific Northwest and the culture of the Deep South are examples of regional cultures of the United States, are they enough to be considered different cultures?
When is a place multicultural vs. monocultural?....
What do you think?
I think the terms "multicultural," like the term "family values," are so driven by political agendas that they are useless terms upon which to try to base a discussion.
Simply look at any of the C-D threads in which they are the subject of the OP.
Obviously, 'multi-culturalism' is a political term to soothe an entrenched population that may fear a siege, which is why 'mono-cultural' was coined to promote the idea that those concerned about different people with different beliefs being integrated into a dominant culture are against allowing cultural differences to co-exist, as they may uproot traditional belief systems which may cause social tensions and the ususal drama such integrations create. Basically, I see the definition (in America) as follows; that a 'monoculturalist' is a fear-mongering, reprehensible and ignorant heathen while a 'multicuturalist' is open and free and a courageous hero. Neither mythical definition takes into account reality since it has been proven by observation that people are concerned about feeling good at whatever the cost and merely need something to feel good about usually, at least in America.
Last edited by Frankums; 05-02-2012 at 11:15 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.