Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-02-2013, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Tampa, Florida
666 posts, read 1,291,610 times
Reputation: 525

Advertisements

I believe we Puerto Ricans really care an eff about our island. Of course not me, but I can't believe one of the most beautiful places in the world with gorgeous ocean sights, beautiful mountains, cliffs, caves, dry forests, rivers, man-made lakes, and even the historic places have been trashed by the residents (most of them) of the island. I read that one of the caverns in the north coast is in very bad shape, some beaches are insanely dirty and I don't want to even mention about safety and crime.

Do you believe other countries/regions surpass Puerto Rico in terms on its people not caring a bit about their homeland?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2013, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
10,646 posts, read 16,032,303 times
Reputation: 5286
Germany, Switzerland, Sweden and Belgium.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2013, 03:48 PM
 
92 posts, read 201,346 times
Reputation: 117
North Korea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 06:23 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,060,466 times
Reputation: 11862
Well if you mean, which countries have degarded/polluted their landscape a lot, I'd have to put China up there. Especially when the Commies got into power. I'm sure there are plenty of Chinese people who see the land as sacred who are heartbroken by this though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 06:27 AM
 
Location: Belgium
1,160 posts, read 1,972,064 times
Reputation: 1435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davy-040 View Post
Germany, Switzerland, Sweden and Belgium.
Most Flemish people here do care a lot about Flanders. Brussels or Wallonia, most don't give a rat's ass I'm afraid. So yes, when it comes to the whole of Belgium, there's not much love involved...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 07:52 AM
 
57 posts, read 102,076 times
Reputation: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
Well if you mean, which countries have degarded/polluted their landscape a lot, I'd have to put China up there. Especially when the Commies got into power. I'm sure there are plenty of Chinese people who see the land as sacred who are heartbroken by this though.
China is no more degraded and polluted now than were the USA, England and Germany during the peak years of their industrial revolutions. You cannot have industrialization without changing the landscape to extract resources and produce energy. Once industrial development has taken place, much of this can be turned around. Compare Pittsburgh today with what it was like 100 years ago. Thirty years ago, Lake Erie was on fire near Cleveland. Two American cities had to be evacuated and closed down in the 1980s due to industrial pollution. West Virginians are dying to this day from industrial diseases. Americans "valued their homelands" so much that the US Congress did not even legislate a Clean Air Act until 1970. All, by the way, without the Commies getting into power.

Last edited by iuyno; 03-03-2013 at 08:01 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 07:58 PM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,060,466 times
Reputation: 11862
Quote:
Originally Posted by iuyno View Post
China is no more degraded and polluted now than were the USA, England and Germany during the peak years of their industrial revolutions. You cannot have industrialization without changing the landscape to extract resources and produce energy. Once industrial development has taken place, much of this can be turned around. Compare Pittsburgh today with what it was like 100 years ago. Thirty years ago, Lake Erie was on fire near Cleveland. Two American cities had to be evacuated and closed down in the 1980s due to industrial pollution. West Virginians are dying to this day from industrial diseases. Americans "valued their homelands" so much that the US Congress did not even legislate a Clean Air Act until 1970. All, by the way, without the Commies getting into power.
That's true, the US was pretty degraded back then and is still in a lot of areas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 12:57 AM
 
Location: North West Northern Ireland.
20,633 posts, read 23,877,481 times
Reputation: 3107
Well im proud to be from Northern Ireland so definately not us northern irish folk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-28-2013, 04:30 AM
 
Location: Lafayette, IN
839 posts, read 982,549 times
Reputation: 392
If a people collectively consider themselves to have a unique tie to a particular 'homeland' (regardless of the legitimacy, or lack thereof, of that connection) and they have used their perceived relationship to one another through that real or imagined idea of a particular geographic location being 'theirs' to political effect then it is pretty clear they do value it... I'm not sure I buy the premise of your question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2013, 02:13 AM
 
Location: El Sereno, Los Angeles, CA
733 posts, read 940,028 times
Reputation: 428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
Well if you mean, which countries have degarded/polluted their landscape a lot, I'd have to put China up there. Especially when the Commies got into power. I'm sure there are plenty of Chinese people who see the land as sacred who are heartbroken by this though.
Communists didn't get into power, Maoist State Capitalists did.

That being said here is a neat list of emigration rates

Going Somewhere? Countries with the Highest Immigration and Emigration Rates

I don't think it's fair to say the Palestinians don't value their homeland, they really seem to, but it's a very tumultuous situation. Samoa is on that list but I think they might have an affinity for it after leaving, as for Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis I don't really have reservations about either so I can believe them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top