Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2015, 09:25 AM
 
1,675 posts, read 2,839,144 times
Reputation: 1454

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mhc1985 View Post
None of the coutries that you mentioned but Cuba and Puerto Rico are losing population.
Several of these ones are indeed growing very slowly (eg. Uruguay) and likely to go in reversal in the future, but not yet. Anyway, I suspect that in the long term countries like Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay itself will keep growing due to immigration from poorer and overpopulated regions of the world.
I doubt brazil, argentina will become a hot bed for migrants from other places of the globe

maybe bolivians etc (next door folks)

if you knew demographics you'll know latin america is getting close to europe's we're screwed demographically, even worse because its not fully developed yet and its already aging fast
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2015, 10:11 AM
AFP
 
7,412 posts, read 6,893,856 times
Reputation: 6632
Quote:
Originally Posted by samngchaoyu View Post
Countries that will drop in pop will have colour front!

Year 2100 NOW

1) India - 1,550,899,000 1,236,344,631
2) China - 941,042,000 1,355,692,576
3) Nigeria - 729,885,000 177,155,754 gain nearly 600 million people
4) United States - 478,026,000 318,892,103
5) Tanzania - 316,338,000 49,639,138
6) Pakistan - 261,271,000 196,174,380
7) Indonesia - 254,178,000 253,609,643 gain a bit
8) Democratic Republic of the Congo - 212,113,000 77,433,744
9) Philippines - 177,803,000 107,668,231
10) Brazil - 177,349,000 202,656,788
11) Uganda - 171,190,000 35,918,915
12) Kenya - 160,009,000 45,010,056
13) Bangladesh - 157,134,000 166,280,712 surprisely, india gain, bangladesh drop!
14) Ethiopia - 150,140,000 96,633,458
15) Iraq - 145,276,000 32,585,692
16) Zambia - 140,348,000 14,309,466
17) Niger - 139,209,000 14,309,466
18) Malawi - 129,502,000 16,407,000 Malawi so small!
19) Sudan - 127,621,000*
20) Mexico - 127,081,000 118,395,054

Okay so we have a pretty good idea of the immigration trend for the future. Looks East and West Africa will be providing immigrants to more developed regions. Europe, North America etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2015, 10:35 AM
 
1,187 posts, read 1,371,503 times
Reputation: 1699
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irene-cd View Post
I doubt brazil, argentina will become a hot bed for migrants from other places of the globe

maybe bolivians etc (next door folks)

if you knew demographics you'll know latin america is getting close to europe's we're screwed demographically, even worse because its not fully developed yet and its already aging fast
Well, I'm not sure I'm the one who should know more about demographics in this discussion, and certainly the *wealthier* countries of Latin America are following Europe's demographic transition. I had put Uruguay as an example of a country whose population may decline in the near future.

I don't expect ABC+Uruguay to receive huge quantities of immigrants, but in a future (2040s, 2050s) where those countries remain with relatively low population density compared to most of the world, some development, geographic adventages provided by both previous points, and maybe increasing social conflicts regarding immigration in the first world (especially Europe), may put these countries as a desirable destination for new waves of emigrants within an even more globalized world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 01:48 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
1,386 posts, read 1,558,382 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rams_Lord View Post
Other estimates:
2050
1) India- 1,656,554,000
2) China- 1,303,723,000
3) United States- 422,554,000
4) Nigeria- 402,426,000
5) Indonesia- 313,021,000
6) Pakistan- 290,848,000
7) Ethiopia- 278,283,000
8) Brazil- 260,692,000
9) Bangladesh- 250,155,000
10) Philippines- 171,964,000
I'd why like to see these other estimates since every estimate published shows China's population dropping by a few hundred million.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 01:53 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
1,386 posts, read 1,558,382 times
Reputation: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by improb View Post
This is nonsense, it's almost impossible to predict demographic changes in the long term, there are so many factors capable to influence birth rates and population change such as wars, epidemies, famines, governmental policies, mass immigration, ecc.

For example, at the turn of the century almost nobody was able to predict the sudden increase of immigration directed to Western European countries.
In the case of China due to the one child policy it's easy to predict a massive demographic decline since the fertility rate is extremely low do to that policy. Add in the extreme pollution in China and estimates showing China to run out of water by 2030 and the population of China could become only a tenth of what it currently is almost 100 years from now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 05:14 AM
 
1,675 posts, read 2,839,144 times
Reputation: 1454
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwa1984 View Post
In the case of China due to the one child policy it's easy to predict a massive demographic decline since the fertility rate is extremely low do to that policy. Add in the extreme pollution in China and estimates showing China to run out of water by 2030 and the population of China could become only a tenth of what it currently is almost 100 years from now.
and that is positive

do we really need BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS OF MOUTHS TO FEED?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 05:24 AM
 
Location: London, UK
9,962 posts, read 12,378,757 times
Reputation: 3473
The UN should impose a one child policy. But because of ''Human rights'' wah wah we want to have 10 kids and burn down the woodland wah wah
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Taipei
8,864 posts, read 8,440,884 times
Reputation: 7414
Quote:
Originally Posted by P London View Post
The UN should impose a one child policy. But because of ''Human rights'' wah wah we want to have 10 kids and burn down the woodland wah wah
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,954,125 times
Reputation: 36644
Don't worry, folks, it ain't gonna happen, or if it does happen, it won't be a problem. These projections are based on paradigms with today's technological and philosophical view, which is ridiculously short-sighted.

Go back to 1900, and see what population projections were like for 2000, based on the 1900 view of arable land, infant mortality, blunt-instrument military weaponry, monarchial/colonial institutions, public health, potable water, horse-velocity transport, etc.

How easy it is to assume that intellect has peaked out, and nothing new remains to be applied to the human condition, and from here on everything has straight-line predictability.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2015, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Chicago, IL
474 posts, read 530,461 times
Reputation: 691
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePage View Post
How about the decline in European population under legalized same-sex marriage?
We all know same-sex couples don't have kids.
( they want to adopt other people's children though !)
If the homosexual population continues to grow at the expense of traditional marriage how can a population grow? by relying on immigration when anti-immigration demonstrations are being held all other in western countries?
Anyone who is offended by what I said should come forward and demonstrated I'm wrong.
The legalization of same sex marriage has absolutely NO effect on population increase/decrease.
Banning gay marriage, likewise, has no effect on population either. The people who otherwise would be getting married are still gay and very unlikely to reproduce. Either way no one is making more or less babies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top