Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What I find interesting about these things and sexuality is that they tend to be a little black and white. There are other supposed indicators that imply that a man might be homosexual or a woman lesbian, but I have found that with myself and other bisexuals, such indicators are majority of the time false-negatives. Meaning they give no actual indication of our preferences. Perhaps it is because the scientific community within the field of human and animal sexuality, has only started focusing on bisexuality relatively recently, whereas before it was completely based on homosexuality, which creates some inherent cultural bias within the studies.
I don't see how a correlation has been established between 2D:4D and sexual orientation.
Please elaborate on how you connected the two things.
I didn't, researchers have. That is homosexual males tend to have very similar ratios to heterosexual women, and homosexual females tend to have similar ratios to heterosexual men. Bisexual men and women correlate with neither (homosexual or heterosexuals), though they are closer to their heterosexual counterparts. This is also stated in the article that that the other poster linked under the picture with instructions on how to measure the length of your fingers.
I didn't, researchers have. That is homosexual males tend to have very similar ratios to heterosexual women, and homosexual females tend to have similar ratios to heterosexual men. Bisexual men and women correlate with neither (homosexual or heterosexuals), though they are closer to their heterosexual counterparts. This is also stated in the article that that the other poster linked under the picture with instructions on how to measure the length of your fingers.
I see I'll look at the links more closely when I get a chance.
I'm thinking of a beautiful British lass to upload here, and to be honest, I genuinely can't think of one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RudyOD
I didn't, researchers have. That is homosexual males tend to have very similar ratios to heterosexual women, and homosexual females tend to have similar ratios to heterosexual men. Bisexual men and women correlate with neither (homosexual or heterosexuals), though they are closer to their heterosexual counterparts. This is also stated in the article that that the other poster linked under the picture with instructions on how to measure the length of your fingers.
Not quite.
It shows MRT performance differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals of both genders. That's not the same as saying that homosexual males and heterosexual females have the same digit ratios/MRT performance.
It shows MRT performance differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals of both genders. That's not the same as saying that homosexual males and heterosexual females have the same digit ratios/MRT performance.
True, that study itself doesn't say that. I had read it somewhere else, just not sure where.
P.S. Im a fan of Emma Watson. Especially in this cowgirl photo shoot.
Back in the 90s the UK had beauty icons such as a young Kate Moss.
Now it has ... Emma Watson?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
:
