Top 50 Most Violent Cities in the World 2015 (renting, crime)

[Davy-040]

Brazilian cities with a homicide rate of at least 35 per 100.000.



Can we say Coast of Death (from Fortaleza to Salvador)?

[orleans]

Brazil: 22 cities

venezuela: 8 cities

mexico: 7 cities

south africa / usa: 4 cities

honduras / colombia: 2 cities

guatemala / jamaica / el salvador: 1 cit7

[Davy-040]

Originally Posted by orleans

Brazil: 22 cities

venezuela: 8 cities

mexico: 7 cities

south africa / usa: 4 cities

honduras / colombia: 2 cities

guatemala / jamaica / el salvador: 1 cit7

52 cities


Brazil: 21 cities
Mexico: 5 cities
Colombia: 3 cities

[Gentoo]

Originally Posted by yueng-ling

It might change if blacks can be bankers, Latinos can be engineers, and Asians can be singers, etc.

If there are just so many choices for you, and you don't like/qualify any of them, you are likely to go wild.

You do realize that poverty is inherited and there is an unofficial caste system in the US right?

[Gentoo]

Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer

It is debatable whether any Americans are "excluded" from the mainstream economy.

The bigger problem is that certain people are unable or unwilling to take advantage of the opportunities that exist. Lack of educational attainment on the part of certain Americans is perhaps the worst problem facing this society.

I take it you've live the life of those you speak of?

[Howest2008]

Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer

It is unfortunate that the high crime rates in the U.S. cities in the list are entirely due to low income minority populations.

No untrue a very small Minority of African American are
doing all of the killing , so are you trying to place the
blame on the Whole AA race???

[Howest2008]

Originally Posted by yueng-ling

"Racial diversity" creates barriers and conflicts in a society, and violence is one consequence.

So all Nations should be of only one racial group right???

[Tlaneloli]

Originally Posted by arctic_gardener

No. Multiculturalism is to blame, not racial diversity. Look at Singapore - they have three major ethnic groups (Chinese, Indian, Malay) but the Singapore government enforces uniculturalism and bans the formation of ethnic ghettos. It's a pretty safe country.

Race and culture are not synonymous.

Singapore with it's 4 official languages, separate family laws for Muslims and provision in the constitution to "care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities of Singapore" enforces uniculturalism?

[BigCityDreamer]

Originally Posted by Gentoo

I take it you've live the life of those you speak of?

Liberals tend to think that the poor exist because discrimination and systemic inequality keep them from accessing opportunities that would improve their situation. Conservatives are more inclined to think that people are poor because they fail to take advantage of opportunities that are actually available to all. This has long been the controversy.

The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle of the two perspectives.

[AFP]

Originally Posted by BigCityDreamer

Liberals tend to think that the poor exist because discrimination and systemic inequality keep them from accessing opportunities that would improve their situation. Conservatives are more inclined to think that people are poor because they fail to take advantage of opportunities that are actually available to all. This has long been the controversy.

The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle of the two perspectives.

Absolutely.

I see it largely as a cultural thing I'll go out on a limb I'm quite comfortable interacting with individuals of different cultures and races as long as they are of a similar class level which ranges from(lower middle class to upper middle class), now for the most part I find the upper class, and lower class quite annoying the upper class you often find individuals that are status oriented(which I have little tolerance for) I bow to no-one, and the lower class tend to complain too much and not take much action.