Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2018, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Canada
7,363 posts, read 8,392,932 times
Reputation: 5260

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by joacocanal View Post
source? I strongly doubt it. Venezuela is an humanitarian mess, there's severe lack of many basic products.


Also, these countries have growing economies, something like 4%/year. They can improve.
The Northern triangle is not a mess? The most violent region with the highest child malnourishment rates in LATAM?


Quote:
Guatemala has the highest chronic undernutrition rate in Latin America and the Caribbean, and fourth in the world
https://www.wfp.org/node/3475/4323/639382
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2018, 06:32 PM
 
881 posts, read 921,127 times
Reputation: 488
that country profile was probably written years ago. Venezuela's situation worsens fast.

for one, infant mortality in Venezuela was estimated as 61 children per every 1000 born. Guatemala is 23 for every 1000 born children.

FAO estimated the % of undernourished people in Guatemala in 15% in 2015. Estimations show the level of child undernourishment in Venezuela in 45%, as of 2018.

the situation in the Northern Triangle has been complicated for decades, but Venezuela is a whole level now, thanks to socialist policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2018, 08:13 PM
 
4,147 posts, read 2,956,277 times
Reputation: 2886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greysholic View Post
Violence is less severe in SE Asia (though the Philippines is quite violent), but poverty is equally bad, if not worse.

Singapore's inequality is pretty awful for a developed country. Obviously there isn't any place that reaches Brazil's level, but a Gini coefficient of >40 is not a good figure to have.
The US has virtually the same gini coefficient as Singapore.

Singapore has a high gini coefficient in part because it is a city-state. Cities (think NYC) tend to have a higher gini coefficient than their respective countries as a whole. Actually, Singapore has a lower gini coefficient than NYC.

New York State has a gini coefficient significantly higher than Singapore, at a whopping .5229.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2018, 08:44 PM
 
Location: Canada
7,363 posts, read 8,392,932 times
Reputation: 5260
Quote:
Originally Posted by joacocanal View Post
that country profile was probably written years ago. Venezuela's situation worsens fast.

for one, infant mortality in Venezuela was estimated as 61 children per every 1000 born. Guatemala is 23 for every 1000 born children.

FAO estimated the % of undernourished people in Guatemala in 15% in 2015. Estimations show the level of child undernourishment in Venezuela in 45%, as of 2018.

the situation in the Northern Triangle has been complicated for decades, but Venezuela is a whole level now, thanks to socialist policies.

No, they are recent. The poor nourishment level of Guatemalans is far worse than 15%. 50% of Guatemalans live in extreme poverty. Those are not estimations. So because Guatemala has been poorer for longer we shouldn't care? Oh right I forgot in Latin America it is only ok to **** on leftist governments, Right wing governments get a pass for their atrocities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2018, 09:18 AM
 
881 posts, read 921,127 times
Reputation: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanLuis View Post
No, they are recent. The poor nourishment level of Guatemalans is far worse than 15%. 50% of Guatemalans live in extreme poverty. Those are not estimations. So because Guatemala has been poorer for longer we shouldn't care? Oh right I forgot in Latin America it is only ok to **** on leftist governments, Right wing governments get a pass for their atrocities.

According to FAO stats, it is: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SN.ITK.DEFC.ZS

it's not that "we shouldn't care", I was just questioning your assumption that Venezuela is in better shape than these countries. Socialism caused a huge humanitarian crisis in Venezuela that has no correlation in any other LatAm country.

According to this, 59% of Guatemalans live under poverty line. It's a lot, but in Venezuela, 90% of people is now under poverty line.


There's only estimations for Venezuelan humanitarian crisis because their socialist government stopped releasing national statistics years ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2018, 11:55 AM
 
Location: Taipei
8,863 posts, read 8,434,218 times
Reputation: 7413
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrJester View Post
The US has virtually the same gini coefficient as Singapore.

Singapore has a high gini coefficient in part because it is a city-state. Cities (think NYC) tend to have a higher gini coefficient than their respective countries as a whole. Actually, Singapore has a lower gini coefficient than NYC.

New York State has a gini coefficient significantly higher than Singapore, at a whopping .5229.
That says more about the US than it says about Singapore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2018, 04:02 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,490,750 times
Reputation: 5031
Southeast Asia definitely has the upper hand at the moment. It’s more stable overall and has experienced greater levels of development. Singapore, KL, Jakarta and HCMC are indistinguishable from what they were 30 years ago.

To be fair though, I’ve always found the comparisons between the two areas to be somewhat misplaced. SE Asia covers a small area of Asia whereas SA is an entire continent and covers far more ground.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 12:49 PM
 
881 posts, read 921,127 times
Reputation: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
Southeast Asia definitely has the upper hand at the moment. It’s more stable overall and has experienced greater levels of development. Singapore, KL, Jakarta and HCMC are indistinguishable from what they were 30 years ago.

To be fair though, I’ve always found the comparisons between the two areas to be somewhat misplaced. SE Asia covers a small area of Asia whereas SA is an entire continent and covers far more ground.

is this true? aren't several of these countries basically dictatorships? at least, according to this source, SEA is much less democratic: https://assetsds.cdnedge.bluemix.net...?itok=y3ydqWCO


I think South America has the upper hand because it's wealthier on average and more developed, there is much disparity in SEA. SEA economies grows at a higher rate but what would happen in 10 years is unpredictable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 02:10 PM
 
Location: London, UK
4,096 posts, read 3,719,099 times
Reputation: 2900
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
SE Asia covers a small area of Asia whereas SA is an entire continent and covers far more ground.
What about population though? Indonesia has more people than Brazil, Argentina and Chile combined. Vietnam is 1/3 the size of Colombia with twice the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2018, 03:30 PM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,490,750 times
Reputation: 5031
Quote:
Originally Posted by joacocanal View Post
is this true? aren't several of these countries basically dictatorships? at least, according to this source, SEA is much less democratic: https://assetsds.cdnedge.bluemix.net...?itok=y3ydqWCO


I think South America has the upper hand because it's wealthier on average and more developed, there is much disparity in SEA. SEA economies grows at a higher rate but what would happen in 10 years is unpredictable.
In a way you’re right. Most SE Asian countries are more authoritarian in nature, though few would classify as dictatorships. Crime and murder are nowhere near as rampant as they are in a good number of SA countries, even though the most dangerous countries are actually in Central America. Singapore is the safest country in the world.

As far as growth is concerned, it’s hard to predict the future, but for the most part I think SE Asia has the upper hand as it’s relatively stable at the moment (bar Myanmar). There’s nothing like the Venezuelan crisis.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top