Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-24-2020, 08:15 AM
 
Location: Montreal
836 posts, read 1,254,262 times
Reputation: 401

Advertisements

Would the world be in a massive economic crisis - with the travel and leisure industries being at a standstill, and non-essential businesses and institutions being closed left, right and centre - if, instead of the current coronavirus pandemic, there would have been a Krakatoa or Tambora type of volcanic eruption just recently? How would it be similar to, and different from, what we're experiencing now with the Covid-19 outbreak the world over?

Alternatively, in the aftermath of a "big one" earthquake that would have recently destroyed a populous and economically important area like California or Japan, would the impacts on the world have been similar to what we're going through now with Covid-19?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-24-2020, 08:55 AM
 
5,214 posts, read 4,015,953 times
Reputation: 3468
Pandemic is worse, an earthquake lasts 2 minutes and recovery starts - with pandemics it's months until recovery starts (best case scenario).



Also, the Japanese Kobe earthquake only ended the claim of Japan as a world leader but it didn't affect anyone outside of Asia.



Basically only a world war or meteor is worse than pandemic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 09:14 AM
 
Location: Montreal
836 posts, read 1,254,262 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by euro123 View Post
Pandemic is worse, an earthquake lasts 2 minutes and recovery starts - with pandemics it's months until recovery starts (best case scenario).



Also, the Japanese Kobe earthquake only ended the claim of Japan as a world leader but it didn't affect anyone outside of Asia.



Basically only a world war or meteor is worse than pandemic.
I bet that a volcano is as bad as a pandemic, and worse than an earthquake, in terms of global impact at least?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 05:17 PM
 
Location: In the heights
37,128 posts, read 39,337,475 times
Reputation: 21202
Quote:
Originally Posted by yofie View Post
I bet that a volcano is as bad as a pandemic, and worse than an earthquake, in terms of global impact at least?
For both of these, it depends on the magnitude of these, where they start, and how the response happens.

Can a volcanic eruption or earthquake set off something worse than the COVID-19 pandemic? Sure. Yea, it certainly can. There are eruptions and earthquakes all the time and most of them aren't so deadly. There are also some real haymakers throughout history and having this alongside something like an unstable geopolitical conflict especially involving nuclear powers can set something off that is far worse than this pandemic.

On the other hand, this pandemic hasn't played itself out and may still be in the fairly early stages. There is at least some chance, with a bungled enough response and an unfortunate mutation or two, that this gets much worse than it has been so far or that this pandemic itself also sets off an unstable geopolitical conflict involving nuclear powers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 05:32 PM
 
5,214 posts, read 4,015,953 times
Reputation: 3468
Quote:
Originally Posted by yofie View Post
I bet that a volcano is as bad as a pandemic, and worse than an earthquake, in terms of global impact at least?

Mega-volcano yes, but aren't they sort of mythological? I mean since the dawn of human civilization we don't have a single case in history, maybe only during the times of the dinosaurs:






https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S05SWBw1w00
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Montreal
836 posts, read 1,254,262 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by euro123 View Post
Mega-volcano yes, but aren't they sort of mythological? I mean since the dawn of human civilization we don't have a single case in history, maybe only during the times of the dinosaurs:
I was referring not necessarily to supervolcanoes like at Yellowstone several hundred years ago (with volcanic explosivity index, or VEI, of 8), and I was certainly not referring to those like Mount St. Helens in 1980 with a VEI of 5 or less nor even to Pinatubo in 1991 with a VEI in the lower 6 range. (VEI is a logorithmic index, just like the Richter scale.)

I was referring more to something like Krakatoa in 1883 (VEI in the upper 6 range) or Tambora in 1815 (VEI of 7). Those eruptions released lots of ash at least regionally and modified the climate for quite some time (including 1816's Year Without a Summer), leading to crop failures and so on, but it didn't spell the end of human civilization like a supervolcano with a VEI of 8 would have. If such eruptions were to occur in this much much more interconnected and globalized age, there would be massive disruptions to society just about on the scale of what we're seeing now with coronavirus, or perhaps even more. The question is (and this is how I started this thread), what would the similarities and differences be with the Covid-19 situation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 06:36 PM
 
5,214 posts, read 4,015,953 times
Reputation: 3468
^ Well it's not an easy question to answer, it's a classic "apples vs oranges" kind of thing. Also let me add another kind of natural disaster to this which is as "studied" as the effect of massive volcanoes:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859


I've been thinking for many years that we haven't had a massive earthquake or solar storm in quite some time both of which will have devastating effects. A volcano seems like lesser evil at least if you look up natural disasters by death toll where the top places are almost always earthquakes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-24-2020, 06:56 PM
 
Location: Montreal
836 posts, read 1,254,262 times
Reputation: 401
Quote:
Originally Posted by euro123 View Post
^ Well it's not an easy question to answer, it's a classic "apples vs oranges" kind of thing. Also let me add another kind of natural disaster to this which is as "studied" as the effect of massive volcanoes:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859


I've been thinking for many years that we haven't had a massive earthquake or solar storm in quite some time both of which will have devastating effects. A volcano seems like lesser evil at least if you look up natural disasters by death toll where the top places are almost always earthquakes.
Death tolls aren't unimportant (after all, even one death is one death too many), but here, the more important thing is to compare the disruptions to the modern world caused by each type of disaster.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2020, 02:01 AM
 
5,428 posts, read 3,491,500 times
Reputation: 5031
The worst thing that could happen is if a gamma-ray burst were to hit the Earth. That would change the composition of our atmosphere, leading to human extinction. You need a supernova in order to create those and there aren’t any in close proximity to us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-25-2020, 08:14 AM
 
5,214 posts, read 4,015,953 times
Reputation: 3468
Quote:
Originally Posted by Milky Way Resident View Post
The worst thing that could happen is if a gamma-ray burst were to hit the Earth. That would change the composition of our atmosphere, leading to human extinction. You need a supernova in order to create those and there aren’t any in close proximity to us.

True but that's classic gamma radiation so it's like having many atomic bombs or Chernobyls. However as to my knowledge the likelihood of this happening isn't probable at all as of now...from wiki:


"Estimating the exact rate at which GRBs occur is difficult; for a galaxy of approximately the same size as the Milky Way, estimates of the expected rate (for long-duration GRBs) can range from one burst every 10,000 years, to one burst every 1,000,000 years.[118] Only a small percentage of these would be beamed towards Earth. Estimates of rate of occurrence of short-duration GRBs are even more uncertain because of the unknown degree of collimation, but are probably comparable.[119]"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > World Forums > World

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top