Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Big bruha in our household over this sentence - Ms knowitall says wack the commas. I say leave them.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; and their resilence, inspiring.
So, should I leave the red commas? Your input is REALLY appreciated!
I would actually do:
"Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm, boundless; their resilience--inspiring."
You can take out the commas but it will mean something different (i.e. you will not be placing emphasis on the words after the commas.) At the end of the day, it depends on what you are trying to say/communicate. In fact, it is inadequate to edit this sentence out of context. Moreover, it depends on whom you are writing for and your audience.
I think it is unbalanced because the tense changed.
Their excitement was infectious; their enthusiasm was boundless; and their resilience was inspiring.
I would write it a little differently. Their boundless energy was exciting, enthusiastic and inspiring.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.